2015
DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.809-810.1257
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Study of Applying a Quality Management Tool for Solving Non-Conformities in a Automotive

Abstract: The paper presents the results of a study concerning the use of the Ishikawa diagram in analyzing the causes that determine a non-quality problem in the operation of a automotive. The studied problem was “the pressure loss on the high pressure branch in the diesel supply system of the COMMON RAIL motor”. All the possible, main and secondary causes that could generate the studied problem were identified. We determined many possible causes and potential sub-causes and we grouped them into three main causes of th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the detection and reporting of NC could happen during the audit, inspection, documentation review, product testing, customer complaints, stakeholders feedback, and general observation based on experience (Luca 2015). In addition to the above, NCs can take many forms and types, which may vary depending on the industry type, so that common NCs include: failure to identify issues, failure to de ne processes, plans, and schedules adequately, process deviations and product defects, deviations from a speci cation of product characteristic, missed plan, customer and supplier return.…”
Section: Nonconformity Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the detection and reporting of NC could happen during the audit, inspection, documentation review, product testing, customer complaints, stakeholders feedback, and general observation based on experience (Luca 2015). In addition to the above, NCs can take many forms and types, which may vary depending on the industry type, so that common NCs include: failure to identify issues, failure to de ne processes, plans, and schedules adequately, process deviations and product defects, deviations from a speci cation of product characteristic, missed plan, customer and supplier return.…”
Section: Nonconformity Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fishbone diagrams are used in security and safety applications [30][31][32][33]. Asllani et al [30] used fishbone diagrams to identify possible contributory factors of network failure/intrusions, and used six different categories to sort and relate contributory factors.…”
Section: Fishbone Diagramsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zhao et al [31] used fishbone diagrams to illustrate possible contributory factors of tower crane accidents under five different categories. Luca et al [32] used fishbone diagrams to illustrate possible contributory factors of noisy functioning of an automotive flue gas system under four different categories. Zhu et al [33] used fishbone diagrams to illustrate possible contributory factors of crude oil vapors explosion in the drain under six different categories.…”
Section: Fishbone Diagramsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The quality major assurance in projects represents essentially the evaluating overall performances of the project to ensure that it meets the standards of reference [10]. The quality assurance in projects includes, Fig.…”
Section: Contentmentioning
confidence: 99%