The study of institutional entrepreneurship and its implications for transition studies

Emprendimiento social: revisión de la literatura y análisis conceptual

“…Con base de lo señalado el esfuerzo del emprendedor impulsa una pasión emprendedora que permite poner el mayor énfasis en las actividades empresariales; en ese sentido, se propone para las personas novatas en este campo que no sienten aún ese impulso se involucren y participen en todos los esfuerzos empresariales, el estudio busca aportar a la literatura en este tema, se recomienda que los posibles asesores o empresarios lo tomen en cuenta, (Zhu et al, 2022). Por otro lado, ante la existencia de diversos contextos, se debe descomponer por que el empresario falla en las innovaciones no tecnológicas, siendo lo contrario con el apoyo de las tecnologías novedosas, requiriéndose para ello evaluar las condiciones y la aplicación de los conceptos asociados, lo señala (Hoogstraaten et al, 2020). La influencia de las innovaciones y el emprendimiento en un entorno socio cultural brindan oportunidades e interacción entre los actores de un pequeño territorio, en razón a una buena comunicación y acción conjunta, creando recientes ecosistemas que contribuyen en la sociedad; por lo tanto, la colaboración es estratégica les permite ofrecer bienes y servicios de forma complementaria, evidenciándose un potencial emprendimiento social, (Boguslavskaya et al, 2021) a) La educación en el emprendimiento La educación es un factor relevante e influyente en el ecosistema emprendedor desde el espacio universitario, en razón que los estudiantes son proactivos para la formulación de políticas para crear empresarios con grandes potencialidades, (Gupta, 2022).…”

Innovation, institutions and institutional innovation

“…Here, a perspective from institutional entrepreneurship can be helpful, where scholars have theorized about the enabling conditions and effective strategies for institutional entrepreneurs to change established institutions in their own favor (Battilana et al 2009). This theory can be further integrated in a multilevel framework as applied to technological transitions in the past (Hoogstraaten et al, 2020). A second follow-up question holds whether our findings about deviating journals are specific to the domain of scientific knowledge production, or whether gatekeepers that deviated from fields' conventions in other domains have had similar impacts on novelty.…”

“…While the contributions to institutional studies might be more obvious, the conceptualization of institutional innovation as new configurations between existing technologies or practices with social environments could also be taken up by innovations scholars. While innovation studies has started to adopt the idea of institutional entrepreneurship (Hoogstraaten et al, 2020), this concept represents cases of 'hypermuscular, heroic entrepreneurs' or social movements that are striving for normative changes in institutional structures (Garud and Karnøe, 2003;Raffaelli and Glynn, 2015;Van Wijk et al, 2013). The more structural conceptualization of institutional innovation used in this thesis is compatible with general notions of innovation and conceptualizations of innovations as socio-technical configurations (Rip and Kemp, 1998), and might be worth exploring in more detail in the context of more traditional innovations studies.…”

“…These studies tend to emphasize that "innovation is not only -and in some cases not even primarily -about technological advance or gauging market demand, but also about actively challenging and creating institutions in a way that an innovation becomes legitimate and accepted" (Pelzer et al, 2019, p. 2). Most of these studies draw on the concept of institutional entrepreneurship in studying co-evolution of innovations and institutions (Hoogstraaten et al, 2020), which is defined as "activities of actors who have an interest in particular institutional arrangements and who leverage resources to create new institutions or transform existing ones" (Maguire et al, 2004, p. 657). These studies thus focus on the agency of actors that actively try to change institutions through legitimizing processes for new organizational activities.…”

Platform innovation in urban mobility transitions

“…Thus, when radical innovations such as new technologies or business models are developed, institutional change is likely to happen (or institutional rigidity prevents such innovations to become mainstream), because they generally do not fit existing institutions inherited from the past (Hoogstraaten et al, 2020). This works in both ways.…”