“…Having defects, which in this case are introduced as “cracks” within the system, be it a TAG system or otherwise, has been shown to be very important to avoid superheating of the system and thus avoid overestimation of the melting point. The presence of voids lowers the estimated melting point due to a lowering of the melting nucleation energy until a plateau is reached with increasing void size. ,− While the proportion of the size of the defect to the crystal size is orders of magnitude larger than that observed in real crystals, this methodology has been shown to be both simple and effective. A more in-depth discussion on this can be found in our previous paper and elsewhere. , Plotting the average melting onset temperature versus the void size in the crystal shows a clear decrease in the average melting point with increasing void size until a plateau is reached, followed by a sharp decrease in the melting point at larger void sizes, indicating the mechanical collapse of the system, with the melting point before the drop taken to be the melting point of the system. , This methodology was tested on five different TAGs, including the TAGs being used in this study, with the simulated melting points being in very good agreement with the empirical melting points …”