2014
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2374713
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Study of Nonlinear Correlation between Shanghai, Hongkong and American Stock Returns An Empirical Analysis Based on MS-VAR Model and MS-DCC-MVGARCH Model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As stated, the methodology used in this paper to determine regime changes within our data follows the work of Zhou et al (2014), who combine MS mechanisms with VAR models to examine correlations between Hong Kong, Shanghai and US stock markets, finding regimes for bull and bear markets between 2005 and 2013.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…As stated, the methodology used in this paper to determine regime changes within our data follows the work of Zhou et al (2014), who combine MS mechanisms with VAR models to examine correlations between Hong Kong, Shanghai and US stock markets, finding regimes for bull and bear markets between 2005 and 2013.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This MSVAR approach has previously been implemented successfully by Brandt and Freeman (2012) who use the technique to determine crisis periods within datasets relating to the violent conflict between Israel and Palestine. In the literature on financial contagion, Zhou et al (2014) construct MSVAR models to measure the nonlinear correlation between stock returns in Shanghai, Hong Kong and America, finding differing characteristics in the correlations amongst markets and various dynamic causal relationships. The MSVAR approach adopted in this paper then, also takes inspiration from the work of Zhou et al (2014).…”
Section: Analysis Of the Hong Kong And Tokyo Stock Marketsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations