2012
DOI: 10.1183/09059180.00003712
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The study of risk in pulmonary arterial hypertension

Abstract: A growing body of published evidence exists on the risk factors for disease progression in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). The Scientific Steering Committee for the Study of Risk in PAH was established to bring together leading clinical and statistical experts in PAH and risk modelling, for the purpose of advancing the understanding of the risk of development and progression of PAH. Herein, we discuss the impact of this information on three key areas: 1) clinical decision-making; 2) policy and reimburse… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the several above-described limitations, we believe that this study is unique and that it would be difficult to perform such a study prospectively, as administering upfront combination therapy for PAH (24) and balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA) for CTEPH before clinical worsening develops has recently become prevalent, especially in Japan. However, limitations on access to PAH medications in patients with less severe disease, and those receiving combination therapy have previously been reported in the UK and Australia, as a consequence of the cost-effectiveness of these therapies (25). In our study, no patients with the TT genotype exhibited clinical worsening with monotherapy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 42%
“…Despite the several above-described limitations, we believe that this study is unique and that it would be difficult to perform such a study prospectively, as administering upfront combination therapy for PAH (24) and balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA) for CTEPH before clinical worsening develops has recently become prevalent, especially in Japan. However, limitations on access to PAH medications in patients with less severe disease, and those receiving combination therapy have previously been reported in the UK and Australia, as a consequence of the cost-effectiveness of these therapies (25). In our study, no patients with the TT genotype exhibited clinical worsening with monotherapy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 42%
“…22 Thus, there is a "need for assessment at multiple follow-up time-points (dynamic assessment) to evaluate the impact of time-dependent variables on clinical outcomes." 26 The change in CO and PVR after 3-4 months may be one of these follow-up variables.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it should be noted that the tools and parameters discussed in this article have mainly been evaluated in the context of baseline risk assessment and very few data are available on their use in the on-going assessment of risk. Tools for dynamic assessment at multiple follow-up time-points would benefit evaluation of the impact of time-dependent variables on clinical outcomes [51].…”
Section: Practical Considerations For Risk Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%