2020
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/staa945
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The study of the angular and spatial distribution of radio-selected AGNs and star-forming galaxies in the ELAIS N1 field

Abstract: The cosmic evolution of bias of different source populations with underlying dark matter density field in post reionization era can shed light on large scale structures. Studying the angular and spatial distribution of different compact sources using deep radio catalogue at lowfrequency is essential to understand the matter distribution of the present Universe. Here, we investigate the relationship of luminous matter with their host dark matter haloes by measuring the angular and spatial clustering of sources … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
(94 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This has motivated many clustering studies at various radio frequencies and to different depths (e.g. Lindsay et al 2014;Magliocchetti et al 2017;Hale et al 2018;Rana & Bagla 2019;Chakraborty et al 2020).…”
Section: Clusteringmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This has motivated many clustering studies at various radio frequencies and to different depths (e.g. Lindsay et al 2014;Magliocchetti et al 2017;Hale et al 2018;Rana & Bagla 2019;Chakraborty et al 2020).…”
Section: Clusteringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…larger than the maximum angular separation used to identify multicomponent sources). We have also added, for comparison, the best-fitting w(θ ) reported by other studies: Lindsay et al (2014),Hale et al (2018), Rana & Bagla (2019), and Chakraborty et al (2020. The results for 'SFG' and 'AGN' byHale et al (2018) are the fits given in their table 1.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has motivated many clustering studies at various radio frequencies and to different depths (e.g. Lindsay et al 2014;Magliocchetti et al 2017;Hale et al 2018Hale et al , 2019Rana & Bagla 2019;Chakraborty et al 2020).…”
Section: Clusteringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…larger than the maximum angular separation used to identify multi-component sources). We have also added, for comparison, the best fit w(θ) reported by other studies:Lindsay et al (2014),Hale et al (2018),Hale et al (2019), Rana & Bagla (2019 andChakraborty et al (2020). The results for "SFG" and "AGN" byHale et al (2018) are the fits given in their Table1.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These are usually referred to as foreground contamination to the signal and have several orders of magnitude higher amplitude (Trott, 2016) compared to the signal itself. A majority of work (Datta et al, 2010;Ghosh et al, 2011;Choudhuri et al, 2016) over the last decade towards the H I power spectrum estimation focuses on better detection, mitigation and avoidance of these foreground contaminations (Choudhuri et al, 2017;Chakraborty et al, 2019a,b;Chakraborty et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%