2015
DOI: 10.1007/s10503-015-9348-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Study of Visual and Multimodal Argumentation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0
13

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
(73 reference statements)
0
34
0
13
Order By: Relevance
“…First, we rely on the perspectives of multimodal argumentation (Groarke, 1996;Kjeldsen, 2015;Tseronis & Forceville, 2017;Rocci & Pollaroli, 2018). In these studies, there is an accepted premise that a cross-fertilization of multimodal, discourseanalytical approaches and argumentation should be favored.…”
Section: An Argumentative Integration To Multimodal Critical Discourse Studies -The Argumentum Model Of Topics (Amt)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, we rely on the perspectives of multimodal argumentation (Groarke, 1996;Kjeldsen, 2015;Tseronis & Forceville, 2017;Rocci & Pollaroli, 2018). In these studies, there is an accepted premise that a cross-fertilization of multimodal, discourseanalytical approaches and argumentation should be favored.…”
Section: An Argumentative Integration To Multimodal Critical Discourse Studies -The Argumentum Model Of Topics (Amt)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the verbal mode has been dominant in argumentation research, multimodal argumentation has begun to interest researchers (Blair, 2015; Howell et al, 2017; Kjeldsen, 2015). In multimodal argumentation, nonverbal and verbal modes can contribute directly or indirectly to conveying an argument (Tseronis, 2018).…”
Section: Theoretical Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, scholars of argument have recognized the need to expand the field to include visual argument (Blair, 1996;Birdsell and Groarke, 1996;Lake and Pickering, 1998) and, more recently, multimodal arguments (Andrews, 2010;Coffin, 2009;Whithaus, 2012). Although there is growing literature in multimodal argumentation, Kjeldsen (2015) observes that '[i]n general, the attitude is that argumentation is closely related to the explicit use of words and therefore [non-verbal argumentation] cannot be argumentation in any proper sense' (Kjeldsen, 2015: 121). In order to render the study of argument relevant to contemporary practices, there is a need to explore the ways in which argument works within and across modes.…”
Section: The Role Of 'Mode' In An Academic Literacies Approach To Argmentioning
confidence: 99%