2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.procs.2017.12.169
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The study on negative eWOM and its relationship to consumer’s intention to switch Mobile Service Provider

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a similar way, ref. [44] demonstrated that negative contents in eWOM impact the cognition, reliability, and trust of consumers.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In a similar way, ref. [44] demonstrated that negative contents in eWOM impact the cognition, reliability, and trust of consumers.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[97] considered that eWOM credibility has a positive impact on e-WOM adoption. In fact, online discussions and opinions between consumers may generate more credibility and empathy than marketer-generated web content [44]. eWOM is a way to help other consumers to make good purchase decisions [98].…”
Section: Source Credibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The increase in Internet usage makes an average of 70% of consumers read other consumers' opinions, and consumer-generated content on a brand of products or services that they interested [2]. Electronic word of mouth (eWOM) defines any statements about products either positive or negative provided by future, present, or experienced customers, and can access such statements by anyone online (Henning et al, 2004).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Trust has been studied from a wide variety of disciplines and backgrounds, with numerous definitions found throughout the literature (Nadarajan et al , 2017). While some researchers have been reluctant to define the concept and others believe it is indefinable (McKnight et al , 2002), another group points to a lack of accepted typology for the concept (Wu and Chang, 2005).…”
Section: Proposed Research Model and Hypothesis Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%