2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.lithos.2020.105767
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The subduction and exhumation history of the Voltri Ophiolite, Italy: Evaluating exhumation mechanisms for high-pressure metamorphic massifs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 115 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The age‐corrected (40 Ma from Starr et al., 2020) bulk‐rock 87 Sr/ 86 Sr isotope ratio of serpentinite is 0.7083 ± 0.0004 (average ± 1 SD). Metagabbro in Zones II to V displays a constant 87 Sr/ 86 Sr isotope ratio of 0.7037 ± 0.0001.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The age‐corrected (40 Ma from Starr et al., 2020) bulk‐rock 87 Sr/ 86 Sr isotope ratio of serpentinite is 0.7083 ± 0.0004 (average ± 1 SD). Metagabbro in Zones II to V displays a constant 87 Sr/ 86 Sr isotope ratio of 0.7037 ± 0.0001.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…A recent study investigated the P‐T ‐time evolution and bulk Sm‐Nd garnet ages of different high‐pressure (HP) mafic rocks in the Voltri Massif to determine whether these mafic rocks were indeed exhumed as blocks within a chaotic mélange or as coherent sections of oceanic lithosphere (Starr et al., 2020). Different from previous studies (e.g., Federico et al., 2007; Malatesta et al., 2012a, 2012b) it was suggested that a significant portion of the Voltri Massif was exhumed as large kilometric‐scale coherent sections of ultramafic and mafic slab material (Cannaò et al., 2016; Smye et al., 2021; Starr et al., 2020). A more detailed assessment of the structural aspects of the entire Voltri Massif is discussed elsewhere (Federico et al., 2007, 2015; Malatesta et al., 2012a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Once crushed to a grain size of 75–100 μm, inclusion phases in garnet were removed using partial dissolution techniques from Starr et al. (2020). Several fine powders were also treated in order to preferentially remove inclusion phases.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note. All garnet samples were cleaned using methods described in Starr et al (2020) unless indicated (labeled "dirty"). "Aliquots" represent garnet crushed to 75-100 μm grain sizes and "powders" are fine (<75 μm grain size) garnet residues collected during the crushing process.…”
Section: Quartz In Garnet Geobarometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each separate was then hand crushed using an agate mortar and pestle to between 75 and 150 μm for chemical preparation. Powder fractions (grain sizes <75 μm) were also collected for analysis and are indicated in the results by “Pwd.” Partial dissolution (Baxter et al., 2002; Dragovic et al., 2012; Pollington & Baxter, 2011; Starr et al., 2020) was used to remove any recalcitrant micro‐inclusions such as apatite, epidote and hornblende that may significantly affect on the isotopic data. Aliquots between 40 and 130 mg of the garnet and garnet powder separates were first chemically leached in 2 mL of 7 N nitric acid (HNO 3 ) for 2 h at 120°C to remove easily dissolved non‐silicate phases.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%