1997
DOI: 10.1007/bf02434853
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The subgroups of the group gl(2,k) that contain a nonsplit maximal torus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recall that T G(σ R ) = G(σ R )T (see [10,Proposition 2]). First we show that to prove the inclusion (2), it is sufficient to prove that for any…”
Section: Lemmamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Recall that T G(σ R ) = G(σ R )T (see [10,Proposition 2]). First we show that to prove the inclusion (2), it is sufficient to prove that for any…”
Section: Lemmamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The case of the field of real numbers has been considered in [14]. For arbitrary fields, the study of overgroups of a nonsplit torus has been conducted in papers [3,[7][8][9][10][11][12][13].The present paper is devoted to an investigation of intermediate subgroups of the general linear group that contain the nonsplit maximal torus related to a radical extension K = k( n √ d) of the ground field k, d ∈ k. The elementary net groups E(σ) associated with the torus T = T (d) and their normalizer N (σ) (which is an overgroup of the nonsplit torus) in the general linear group G = GL(n, k) are of primary importance in studies of the intermediate subgroups mentioned above (see [7][8][9][10][11]). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The complete description of the subgroup lattice Lat(T, GL(n, k)) has been obtained for certain fields (e.g. local, finite), but for arbitrary fields only the case n = 2 has been considered; see [5] and references in [10]. It turns out that the structure of the lattice of intermediate subgroups for non-split tori is strikingly different from the split case, but, nevertheless, for n = 2 the lattice of intermediate subsemigroups coincides with the lattice of intermediate subgroups.…”
Section: Paninmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It turns out that the structure of the lattice of intermediate subgroups for non-split tori is strikingly different from the split case, but, nevertheless, for n = 2 the lattice of intermediate subsemigroups coincides with the lattice of intermediate subgroups. Indeed, let g ∈ G, then it follows from Lemma 1 [5] that there exist t, t ′ ∈ T such that g −1 = tgt ′ .…”
Section: Paninmentioning
confidence: 99%