1957
DOI: 10.5860/crl_18_02_123
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Subject Ph.D. and Librarianship

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1957
1957
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…X , z = 8 ft; . , z = 10 ft. Keshavan (1972) and Richmond (1957) should be considered suspect as the flow may not have been in a fully turbulent state. Thus for the determination of constants in the wall law we use measurements at stations further downstream (so as to ensure that tripping effects have become small) and larger values of R,…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…X , z = 8 ft; . , z = 10 ft. Keshavan (1972) and Richmond (1957) should be considered suspect as the flow may not have been in a fully turbulent state. Thus for the determination of constants in the wall law we use measurements at stations further downstream (so as to ensure that tripping effects have become small) and larger values of R,…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Author Richmond (1957) Yu (1959) Willmarth & Yang (1970) Rao & Keshavan (1972) Axisymmetric turbulent boundary layer on a circular cylinder 117 must be capable of being regarded as higher-order perturbations to a basically two-dimensional flow. A consequence of this argument is that the measurements quoted above must show a logarithmic region when plotted in two-dimensional co-ordinates.…”
Section: N Afzal and R Narasimhamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The article, entitled "The Subject Ph.D. and Librarianship," provided insight into the job opportunities for subject 'Ph.D.s in libraries. 7 However she failed to mention the field of library education in this regard. Her conclusion that a subject Ph.D. would have the best of both worlds (status with faculty members as well as with other librarians) was an accurate reflection of the prestige enjoyed by those subject Ph.D.s who entered the field of librarianship in those decades.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two decades ago Phyllis Richmond observed that subject Ph.D.s enter the field of librarianship for two reasons: ( 1 ) their interest in libraries developed from teaching or research in their subject field, or ( 2) they enter by design perhaps because they do not want to teach. 1 Today we can add a third reason -the academic job crisis! It is obvious that the influx into librarianship of subject Ph.D.s is being accelerated by the strained job market in many academic disciplines.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%