2017
DOI: 10.1007/s12144-017-9673-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Subjective Risk Intelligence Scale. The Development of a New Scale to Measure a New Construct

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
45
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 109 publications
2
45
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It would be possible to broaden the path by providing for further meetings so as to also include within it new constructs relating to risk in society [104].…”
Section: Implications For Theory and Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It would be possible to broaden the path by providing for further meetings so as to also include within it new constructs relating to risk in society [104].…”
Section: Implications For Theory and Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, we aimed to explore how values could influence risk intelligence, conceptualized as a multidimensional psychological characteristic that helps individuals to effectively assess risks, considering their advantages and disadvantages, facing them as an opportunity rather than a threat, and feeling able to manage a certain margin of uncertainty about the outcome of one’s choice [ 27 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Subjective Risk Intelligence Scale (SRIS, [ 27 ]) has a total of twenty-one items; the statements presented describe behaviours or moods, and respondents have to answer in a five-point Likert-type scale from 1 (totally disagree) to 5 (totally agree). Sample items are “to be able to create new procedures, I think for myself instead of following procedures established by others” (measure of imaginative capability), “I feel able to make decisions even when I don’t have all the information” (measure of problem-solving self-efficacy), “when I feel fearful about something, I have difficulty concentrating on everything” (measure of emotional stress vulnerability), and “the uncertainty about possible developments of a situation paralyzes me” (measure of negative attitude toward uncertainty).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Linear structural equations models were used to verify the hypothesized model. Tests were executed in AMOS 25.0 [65] through the maximum likelihood method. Firstly, a series of confirmatory factor analyses (CFA) were carried out on the dataset to establish if the short version (six items) one-factor model was that which best fit the data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%