1970
DOI: 10.1016/s0003-2670(01)81833-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The substoichiometric determination of chromium in aluminium alloys

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1971
1971
1977
1977

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the latter case, the chelate is usually separated with a cation exchanger. In experiments on the substoichiometric separation of molybdenum with 8-hydroxyquinoline in chloroform we found 23 the reproducibility of the count-rate to be ± 0.3% from 2.0 x 10~3 M solutions in the volume range 3 to 8 ml, while in the extraction of the ion-association compound of chromium(VI) with tetraphenylarsonium chloride 18 the reproducibility was ± 1.3% from 1.0 x 10" 2 M solutions in the volume range 1 to 25 ml. The standard deviation in the first case was 0.6% and in the second case 1.0% It has been pointed out by workers active in the field of substoichiometric analysis 20 ' 24 that a modification of the method can be applied even in cases where the amount of the element isolated by substoichiometric extraction is not strictly independent of the amount of it in solution.…”
Section: / Extraction Of the Element From Solutions Of Different Conmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the latter case, the chelate is usually separated with a cation exchanger. In experiments on the substoichiometric separation of molybdenum with 8-hydroxyquinoline in chloroform we found 23 the reproducibility of the count-rate to be ± 0.3% from 2.0 x 10~3 M solutions in the volume range 3 to 8 ml, while in the extraction of the ion-association compound of chromium(VI) with tetraphenylarsonium chloride 18 the reproducibility was ± 1.3% from 1.0 x 10" 2 M solutions in the volume range 1 to 25 ml. The standard deviation in the first case was 0.6% and in the second case 1.0% It has been pointed out by workers active in the field of substoichiometric analysis 20 ' 24 that a modification of the method can be applied even in cases where the amount of the element isolated by substoichiometric extraction is not strictly independent of the amount of it in solution.…”
Section: / Extraction Of the Element From Solutions Of Different Conmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…nT + + Z n " = [ T n Z ] o r g (18) where T + is the heavy cation and Z n~ is the anion to be extracted. The extraction constant is given by -ext…”
Section: Solvent Extraction Of Ion-association Compoundsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation