2003
DOI: 10.1080/13642980308629708
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Succession of States in Universal Treaties on the Protection of Human Rights and Humanitarian Law

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[50] With respect to human rights treaties, the question of 'automatic succession' and its customary nature is even more pronounced, with views ranging from acceptance to outright rejection (Jenks [1952] at 142;Müllerson [1994] at 154-7; Bos [1995] at 18; Kamminga [1996] at 472-3;Shaw [1994] at 84; Stern [1996] at 297-306; Higgins [1998] at 696-7;Rasulov [2003]; Ruiz [2011] at 69; Zimmermann and Devaney [2019]).…”
Section: Succession To Human Rights Treatiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[50] With respect to human rights treaties, the question of 'automatic succession' and its customary nature is even more pronounced, with views ranging from acceptance to outright rejection (Jenks [1952] at 142;Müllerson [1994] at 154-7; Bos [1995] at 18; Kamminga [1996] at 472-3;Shaw [1994] at 84; Stern [1996] at 297-306; Higgins [1998] at 696-7;Rasulov [2003]; Ruiz [2011] at 69; Zimmermann and Devaney [2019]).…”
Section: Succession To Human Rights Treatiesmentioning
confidence: 99%