1998
DOI: 10.2224/sbp.1998.26.1.57
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Suinn-Lew Asian Self-Identity Acculturation Scale: Test With a Non-Student, Asian-American Sample

Abstract: Ethnic diversity is a major trend in the Unite d States with Asian Americans constituting a rapidly growing percentage of the population. Consequently, acculturation among Asian-Americans is an important issue since ethnic diversity both offers cultural richness and contributes to challenges for educational systems, public health services, and entities c oncerned with consumer practices. The S uinn-Lew Asian Self-Identity Acculturation (SL-ASIA) Scale was tested with a non-student, random sample (N = 124) comp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
26
2
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
3
26
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present study, both the JAAS and SAAS had high internal reliability scores (asˆ.96 and .91, respectively) and good construct validity (correlated with generation level when the generation level item was removed from the acculturation scale, rsˆ.76 and .76, ps < .001, respectively). In addition, for immigrant mothers, age at time of immigration, r(24)ˆ¡.41, p < .05, and r(28)ˆ¡.33, p < .10, and number of years mothers had lived in the US at the time of the study, r(24)ˆ.71, p < .001, and r(28)ˆ.43, p < .05, correlated with acculturation level on the JAAS and SAAS, respectively; these correlation coef cients are similar in direction and magnitude to those found in other studies (e.g., Ownbey & Horridge, 1998). Only acculturation level was screened as a covariate because acculturation level is a psychological measure which encompasses other demographic variables; in addition, number of years in the US and age at time of immigration, for example, apply only to rst-generation mothers and not to the entire sample.…”
Section: Questionnairessupporting
confidence: 81%
“…In the present study, both the JAAS and SAAS had high internal reliability scores (asˆ.96 and .91, respectively) and good construct validity (correlated with generation level when the generation level item was removed from the acculturation scale, rsˆ.76 and .76, ps < .001, respectively). In addition, for immigrant mothers, age at time of immigration, r(24)ˆ¡.41, p < .05, and r(28)ˆ¡.33, p < .10, and number of years mothers had lived in the US at the time of the study, r(24)ˆ.71, p < .001, and r(28)ˆ.43, p < .05, correlated with acculturation level on the JAAS and SAAS, respectively; these correlation coef cients are similar in direction and magnitude to those found in other studies (e.g., Ownbey & Horridge, 1998). Only acculturation level was screened as a covariate because acculturation level is a psychological measure which encompasses other demographic variables; in addition, number of years in the US and age at time of immigration, for example, apply only to rst-generation mothers and not to the entire sample.…”
Section: Questionnairessupporting
confidence: 81%
“…A scale developed by Suinn-Lew and colleagues (Suinn, Khoo, & Ahuna, 1995;Suinn, Rickard-Figeroa, Lew, & Vigil, 1987) based on samples of Asian university students and nonstudents (Ownbey & Horridge, 1998) was adapted for telephone administration in the present study (Hofstetter et al, 2004). Validity of the scale has been supported by Kim, Atkinson, and Yang (1999);Suinn, Ahuna, and Khoo (1992); Kodama and Canetto (1995); and Ownbey and Horridge (1998). Items tapped aspects of cultural preferences involving language, music, and food; self-identification; father's identification; and social linkages including ethnicity of peers and preferred associations.…”
Section: Smoking Cessation: Raw Measuresmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Other studies that involved acculturation scales such as the Suinn-Lew Self-Identity Acculturation (e.g. Ownbey & Horridge, 1998) have been criticized for use of a composite score since such usage of the scale simplifies the effects of acculturation on outcome variables and also implies that acculturation is a single latent construct (Salant & Lauderdale, 2003).…”
Section: Measurement Of Acculturationmentioning
confidence: 99%