2005
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti645
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The SuMo server: 3D search for protein functional sites

Abstract: mjambon@burnham.org.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
65
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
65
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, no structural or functional similarities are detected between an actin protein bound to ATP (PDB code: 1S22) and a myosin protein bound to ATP (PDB code: 1FMW). 60,61,63,64 The classification tool MED-SMA was implemented to use this ability to classify datasets of binding sites. 63 It operates through three main steps: (i) comparison of all the binding sites of a dataset using a pairwise comparison system, (ii) detection of matching regions in the binding sites to build a similarity graph, and (iii) classification of this graph with the Markov clustering algorithm (MCL).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For example, no structural or functional similarities are detected between an actin protein bound to ATP (PDB code: 1S22) and a myosin protein bound to ATP (PDB code: 1FMW). 60,61,63,64 The classification tool MED-SMA was implemented to use this ability to classify datasets of binding sites. 63 It operates through three main steps: (i) comparison of all the binding sites of a dataset using a pairwise comparison system, (ii) detection of matching regions in the binding sites to build a similarity graph, and (iii) classification of this graph with the Markov clustering algorithm (MCL).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16,60,61,64 Its main advantage is to detect binding sites with similar or related binding modes which could not be identified using rigid (or even flexible) superimposition approaches. Its heuristic is based on a 3D representation of macromolecule structures using precise Structural Chemical Features (SCFs).…”
Section: Med-sumo Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Protein function annotation using local structure features is known to be more accurate than using only sequence or structure alignments [1]. The following methods have been proposed for finding local structural motifs in protein families, and known functional sites in protein structures: -Depth-first search starting from simple geometric patterns such as triangles, and progressively finding larger patterns [27,29,8,17]. -Geometric hashing can compare two protein struc-tures [24] or a structure to a database [6].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A variety of techniques exist for protein similarity searching, ranging in computational complexity from global structural superposition methods [1] to more complex substructure or fingerprint searches. [2][3][4][5] The ProBiS algorithm of Konc and Janezic [6] belongs to the latter class of algorithms and detects pairwise local similarities in proteins by computing the similarity of protein graphs, which are representations of specific proteins. It runs in the ProBiS web server [7] at http:// probis.cmm.ki.si and the parallel version was used to create the ProBiS-Database, [8] a repository of over 420 million precalculated binding site similarities and local pairwise alignments of protein database (PDB) structures at http://probis.cmm.ki.si/ database.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%