2005
DOI: 10.1142/s0217751x05022263
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Superfield Quantisation of a Superparticle Action With an Extended Line Element

Abstract: A massive superparticle action based on the generalised line element in N=1 global superspace is quantised canonically. A previous method of quantising this action, based on a Fock space analysis, showed that states existed in three supersymmetric multiplets, each of a different mass. The quantisation procedure presented uses the single first class constraint as an operator condition on a general N=1 superwavefunction. The constraint produces coupled equations of motion for the component wavefunctions. Transfo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Alternatively, noncommutation relations, Section 2.2, between dxμ$$ {dx}^{\mu } $$ and the fundamental tensor on both Finsler and Riemann manifolds, should be invented. Despite the conclusion drawn in Martinetti (2009), that neither the fundamental tensor nor dxμ$$ {dx}^{\mu } $$ seems to have an obvious noncommutation translation, with noncommutative differential calculus Dubois‐Violette (2001), Madore (2000), noncommutative metric tensor Ulhoa et al (2015) would represent an alternative procedure toward a noncommutative line element FitzGerald (2005). All these research directions could be followed elsewhere.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, noncommutation relations, Section 2.2, between dxμ$$ {dx}^{\mu } $$ and the fundamental tensor on both Finsler and Riemann manifolds, should be invented. Despite the conclusion drawn in Martinetti (2009), that neither the fundamental tensor nor dxμ$$ {dx}^{\mu } $$ seems to have an obvious noncommutation translation, with noncommutative differential calculus Dubois‐Violette (2001), Madore (2000), noncommutative metric tensor Ulhoa et al (2015) would represent an alternative procedure toward a noncommutative line element FitzGerald (2005). All these research directions could be followed elsewhere.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this regard, we emphasize that neither the metric tensor nor the 1-form, dx µ , has noncommutative translations [22]. Alternatively, we might recall noncommutative metric tensor [23] and noncommutative differential calculus [24,25] to define a noncommutative line element [26]. This could be performed elsewhere.…”
Section: First Fundamental Form On Discretized Finsler Manifoldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, defining a noncommutative differential calculus [57,58] and a noncommutative metric tensor [59], could be conducted. This is conjectured to allow for integrating both procedures in defining a noncommutative measure of the line element [60]. Furthermore, the modified relativistic kinematics, which is geometrically described by Finsler geometry, describes conceivable vacuum state of quantum gravity, at low energies [61].…”
Section: Remarks On Gr and Qm Generalizationmentioning
confidence: 99%