2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2020.12.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The superiority of 72 h leukocyte descent over CRP for mortality prediction in patients with sepsis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to the results of Goldberg et al, [45] the results of this study showed that WBC < 3.5 × 10 9 /L was a risk factor affecting the prognosis of ICU patients with sepsis. As immune cells and important immune markers in human blood, leukocyte can well resist the invasion of foreign pathogens.…”
Section: Wbc < 35 × 10 9 /Lcontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to the results of Goldberg et al, [45] the results of this study showed that WBC < 3.5 × 10 9 /L was a risk factor affecting the prognosis of ICU patients with sepsis. As immune cells and important immune markers in human blood, leukocyte can well resist the invasion of foreign pathogens.…”
Section: Wbc < 35 × 10 9 /Lcontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Consistent with findings of CRP in other settings, 2224 high pre-implant CRP was associated with increased hospital mortality in patients after LVAD. Besides, the current study indicated that both pre-implant and post-implant CRP is significant predictor of long-term mortality following LVAD implantation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Of note, both fibrinogen and CRP represent positive acute phase proteins and may be increased in patients with sepsis. However, CRP was shown to have a poor prognostic accuracy in patients with sepsis within various clinical studies (AUC 0.479) [30]. This may be related to the role of CRP in clearing bacterial and biological debris and tissue healing rather than reflecting disease progression in sepsis or septic shock [31].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%