1954
DOI: 10.1097/00006324-195405000-00004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Suppression Theory of Binocular Vision

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1955
1955
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Single vision is explained in another theoretical view by assuming that only one image reaches the projection area, i.e., in normal binocular vision the "second" image is suppressed. This viewpoint skirts the powerful theory of stereopsis by offering evidence to show that phenomenal depth is not destroyed during binocular rivalry of two stereo half-images, implying, of course, that in normal binocular vision, both excitations are not required for depth perception (Asher, 1953;Verhoeff, 1935).…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Single vision is explained in another theoretical view by assuming that only one image reaches the projection area, i.e., in normal binocular vision the "second" image is suppressed. This viewpoint skirts the powerful theory of stereopsis by offering evidence to show that phenomenal depth is not destroyed during binocular rivalry of two stereo half-images, implying, of course, that in normal binocular vision, both excitations are not required for depth perception (Asher, 1953;Verhoeff, 1935).…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Another possible mechanism that can explain the data obtained is suggested by the notion of contralateral suppression (cf. Asher, 1953;Hochberg, 1964;Kaufman, 1963;Levelt, 1965). Whereas the eye-movement hypothesis accounts for rivalry by the fluctuating asymmetrical input of information, the suppression hypothesis suggests that rivalry occurs when, successively, one visual field actively suppresses the input of the contralateral field.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is known as binocular rivalry and this property has been studied extensively. Asher states that rivalry occurs in local regions of the visual field, and only one eye's view is dominant within these regions [14]. Fig.…”
Section: Binocular Suppressionmentioning
confidence: 99%