1985
DOI: 10.1007/bf00409215
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The suppressive effect of tape-stripping treatment of guinea-pig skin on the induction of contact sensitivity by intradermal injection of haptenated epidermal cells

Abstract: Contact sensitivity (CS) to 2,4-dinitrochlorobenzene (DNCB) was produced in inbred JY1-strain guinea pigs by the intradermal injection of epidermal cells (ECs) prepared from DNCB-painted skin (DNP-ECs). When the site of DNP-EC-induced CS was pretreated by tape stripping, the rate and intensity of the challenge reactions to DNCB were diminished. The ability of DNP-ECs to induce CS returned to normal when normal peritoneal macrophages together with DNP-ECs were administered into the stripped skin. Normal ECs had… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since it has been reported that excessive tapestrippings induce immuno-suppression in contact hypersensitivity [16], we determined whether the degree of contact hypersensitivity by PiCl as measured by ear swelling is also suppressed by tape-stripping under our experimental conditions. Eight tape-strippings during the sensitization phase did not reduce the intensity of the PiCl-induced contact hypersensitivity on aural skin as compared to that without tape-stripping ( Fig.…”
Section: Effects Of Barrier Disruption On the Degree Of Contact Hypermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since it has been reported that excessive tapestrippings induce immuno-suppression in contact hypersensitivity [16], we determined whether the degree of contact hypersensitivity by PiCl as measured by ear swelling is also suppressed by tape-stripping under our experimental conditions. Eight tape-strippings during the sensitization phase did not reduce the intensity of the PiCl-induced contact hypersensitivity on aural skin as compared to that without tape-stripping ( Fig.…”
Section: Effects Of Barrier Disruption On the Degree Of Contact Hypermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, enhanced CHS responses to dinitrofluorobenzene and picryl-chloride have been observed (Nishijima et al, 1997). In contrast, Oka et al (1985) reported reduced CHS responses to dinitrochlorobenzene on tape stripping. Impaired sensitization was initially explained by the finding that Langerhans cells are depleted by tape stripping (Streilein et al, 1982).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%