2015
DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2015.0138
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Supreme Court Ruling That Blocked Providers From Seeking Higher Medicaid Payments Also Undercut The Entire Program

Abstract: In Armstrong v. Exceptional Child Center, Inc., the US Supreme Court revisited the question of whether Medicaid providers may seek relief in federal courts when states fail to pay "sufficient" Medicaid rates. A divided Supreme Court held that the Supremacy Clause of the US Constitution does not support such actions, even when states violate the Medicaid Act of 1965. Payment sufficiency is vital to Medicaid's success in expanding health insurance coverage under the Affordable Care Act. By terminating providers'… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This requires physician reimbursement rates to be ''sufficient to enlist enough providers so that services under the plan are available to recipients at least to the extent that those services are available to the general population'' [18]. Despite this provision, the reimbursement rate disparity between private insurance and Medicaid continues to be substantial, as does the disparity between Medicaid and Medicare rates [10]. Additionally, for a given reimbursement rate, private practices were less likely to take an adult patient with Medicaid insurance relative to an academic practice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This requires physician reimbursement rates to be ''sufficient to enlist enough providers so that services under the plan are available to recipients at least to the extent that those services are available to the general population'' [18]. Despite this provision, the reimbursement rate disparity between private insurance and Medicaid continues to be substantial, as does the disparity between Medicaid and Medicare rates [10]. Additionally, for a given reimbursement rate, private practices were less likely to take an adult patient with Medicaid insurance relative to an academic practice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reimbursement rates for CPT 1 codes 99213 (established followup outpatient visit -level 3 of 5), 99243 (new outpatient consultation -level 3 of 5), and 27786 (closed treatment of distal fibular fracturelateral malleolus -without manipulation -surgical care only) were determined at the time of the telephone survey via state Medicaid agency fee schedules for comparison to the responses attained via the telephone survey (Table 1). If the state Medicaid fee schedule did not provide the required information, the Kaiser Foundation Medicare-toMedicaid Fee Index was used to determine the associated CPT 1 code Medicaid reimbursement rates from known Medicare reimbursement rates [6,10,17,20].…”
Section: National Orthopaedic Practice Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%