2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.pss.2014.04.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The surface geology and geomorphology of Phobos

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
93
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
1
93
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Results indicate ejecta blanket thicknesses between 35 and 54 m, assuming uniform distribution over the surface of Phobos. These numbers are consistent with observed crater morphologies, which indicate regolith thicknesses of 5–100 m [ Basilevsky et al , ]. If the grooves are interpreted as drainage pits for regolith along planes of fracture, this amount is not sufficient to supply the 100–400 m of unconsolidated material necessary to produce such formations [ Thomas et al , ; Horstman and Melosh , ; Murray and Heggie , ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Results indicate ejecta blanket thicknesses between 35 and 54 m, assuming uniform distribution over the surface of Phobos. These numbers are consistent with observed crater morphologies, which indicate regolith thicknesses of 5–100 m [ Basilevsky et al , ]. If the grooves are interpreted as drainage pits for regolith along planes of fracture, this amount is not sufficient to supply the 100–400 m of unconsolidated material necessary to produce such formations [ Thomas et al , ; Horstman and Melosh , ; Murray and Heggie , ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that while these damage levels are significantly lower than the near‐global damage found in 2‐D axisymmetric calculations [ Asphaug and Melosh , ], they appear comparable to the localized damage found in a subsequent 3‐D calculation, which used an ellipsoidal Phobos target [ Asphaug et al , ]. While Phobos currently appears to be blanketed by a layer of unconsolidated material [ Basilevsky et al , ], its state at the time of the Stickney impact is uncertain. The influence of regolith on the results was tested using a 100 m thick layer of strengthless basalt at the surface of Phobos.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On Mercury, much of the spectral reflectance variations are controlled by minor differences in graphite and is disconnected from variations in major element chemistry . The blue unit is associated with Stickney ejecta, but not all ejecta are blue, suggesting that the blue unit may be exposed material from a subsurface reservoir of chemically distinct material (Basilevsky et al, 2014). The red unit has absorption near 0.65 μm, attributed to Fe-phyllosilicates or a mixture of grain sizes of metallic Fe, which is lacking from the blue unit.…”
Section: Megane Science Goal 2: Study Surface Processes On Airless Bomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, both craters, D'Arrest and the unnamed crater next to it, show mass wasting from their irregular southern rims (Figure 1e). We adopt the distribution map of mass wasting features described by Basilevsky et al [2014] (…”
Section: Mass Wasting Features On Phobosmentioning
confidence: 99%