2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.elspec.2010.05.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The surface state of URu2Si2

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

4
17
4

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
4
17
4
Order By: Relevance
“…We do not observe any appreciable dispersion along k z for features 2, 3, and 4, while feature 1 has already been ascribed to a surface-derived origin [14] and feature 5 is apparent at only very few photon energies. The main effect of varying photon energies observed here is to strongly modulate the photoelectron matrix elements of these different features, suggesting that these states have substantially different orbital character.…”
mentioning
confidence: 72%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We do not observe any appreciable dispersion along k z for features 2, 3, and 4, while feature 1 has already been ascribed to a surface-derived origin [14] and feature 5 is apparent at only very few photon energies. The main effect of varying photon energies observed here is to strongly modulate the photoelectron matrix elements of these different features, suggesting that these states have substantially different orbital character.…”
mentioning
confidence: 72%
“…1 f. Feature 1 has been previously shown to be of surface origin and does not show significant changes across T HO , while feature 2 corresponds to a light hole-like band which has been attributed to a bulk state [13,14]. Feature 3 exhibits an 'M'-shaped dispersion and was also reported for hν = 7 eV [15,16].…”
mentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1(f) show the existence of a hole pocket. While the hole-like band observed at two different photon energies was experimentally shown as a surface-originated state2227, the hole pocket is also suggested as a surface-derived state owing to the absence of k z dependence and its inconsistency with bulk-sensitive measurements (see Supplementary Fig. S2 and Supplementary Discussion 1 for details).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The discussion of this interesting possibility, later continued in [36] was further neglected, since this particular feature does not appear to be directly related to HO. However, because of its intensity, it is masking the fine details at E f , which makes photoemission measurements in this system most difficult.…”
Section: Arpes and Ho Transitionmentioning
confidence: 96%