Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
Objectives Temporary anchorage devices (TADs) have reduced the need for anterior segmental ostomy (ASO) in Class I patients; however, ASO remains relevant in Class II patients. As previous studies were conducted before the usage of TADs, updated guidelines are required to determine the relationship between surgery and orthodontic treatment. This study aimed to evaluate the hard tissue changes following ASO versus non-ASO (NASO) orthodontic treatment utilizing TADs with premolar extraction. Materials and Methods This retrospective clinical study involved 67 patients (18 male, 49 female; mean age: 33.9 years) diagnosed with skeletal Class II malocclusion. The patients were categorized into the ASO (n = 31) and NASO (n = 36) groups. Cephalometric analyses were conducted to compare initial and final records to assess the treatment effects Results Pre-and post-treatment changes in the ASO and NASO groups exhibited significant differences in ΔSNA, ΔSNB, ΔANB, ΔA to N-perp, ΔB to N-perp, ΔPog to N-perp, and ΔA to FH (P < 0.05). While the reduction in ANB in the ASO group compared with that in the NASO group was clinically significant at 1.77, both groups demonstrated normalized ANB, indicating significant skeletal improvement in Class II malocclusion. Specifically, the change in FMIA (ΔL1 to FH [°]) was 4.98° greater in the NASO group than in the ASO group (P < 0.05). Conclusions Our findings revealed the importance of the incisor mandibular plane angle (IMPA) in treatment decision-making between ASO and NASO treatment. Clinical Relevance: This study highlights IMPA's importance in treatment planning and aids in selecting ASO and NASO treatments.
Objectives Temporary anchorage devices (TADs) have reduced the need for anterior segmental ostomy (ASO) in Class I patients; however, ASO remains relevant in Class II patients. As previous studies were conducted before the usage of TADs, updated guidelines are required to determine the relationship between surgery and orthodontic treatment. This study aimed to evaluate the hard tissue changes following ASO versus non-ASO (NASO) orthodontic treatment utilizing TADs with premolar extraction. Materials and Methods This retrospective clinical study involved 67 patients (18 male, 49 female; mean age: 33.9 years) diagnosed with skeletal Class II malocclusion. The patients were categorized into the ASO (n = 31) and NASO (n = 36) groups. Cephalometric analyses were conducted to compare initial and final records to assess the treatment effects Results Pre-and post-treatment changes in the ASO and NASO groups exhibited significant differences in ΔSNA, ΔSNB, ΔANB, ΔA to N-perp, ΔB to N-perp, ΔPog to N-perp, and ΔA to FH (P < 0.05). While the reduction in ANB in the ASO group compared with that in the NASO group was clinically significant at 1.77, both groups demonstrated normalized ANB, indicating significant skeletal improvement in Class II malocclusion. Specifically, the change in FMIA (ΔL1 to FH [°]) was 4.98° greater in the NASO group than in the ASO group (P < 0.05). Conclusions Our findings revealed the importance of the incisor mandibular plane angle (IMPA) in treatment decision-making between ASO and NASO treatment. Clinical Relevance: This study highlights IMPA's importance in treatment planning and aids in selecting ASO and NASO treatments.
Background/Objectives: This systematic review seeks to assess the effectiveness of different orthodontic and combined orthodontic–surgical approaches for correcting gummy smile, with a focus on treatment efficacy, duration, and the potential for integrating various techniques. The objective is to offer evidence-based recommendations for the optimal management of gummy smile. Methods: A thorough search of the literature was conducted in the PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Web of Science databases, covering publications from 1 January 1982 to 4 November 2024. Only randomized controlled trials involving adult human subjects with available full-text articles were included, while systematic reviews, editorials, case reports, and studies involving animals or in vitro experiments were excluded. Studies were selected based on their relevance to orthodontic or combined orthodontic–surgical treatments for correcting excessive gingival display (gummy smile), particularly in cases where residual growth does not impact treatment outcomes. The primary focus was on evaluating the efficacy of these interventions in improving smile aesthetics. Follow-up data were considered when available, though not required for inclusion. Results: The findings revealed that both orthodontic and surgical methods are effective in reducing gingival display. Orthognathic surgery offers lasting outcomes, particularly for patients with vertical maxillary excess, whereas orthodontic treatments, including the use of skeletal anchorage devices, are particularly effective for less severe cases. Minimally invasive approaches, such as botulinum toxin injections, provided temporary but promising results for patients reluctant to undergo surgery. Conclusions: Orthodontic and surgical techniques are viable options for treating gummy smile, with treatment choices depending on the condition’s severity. Future research, particularly long-term randomized studies, is required to further refine treatment protocols and improve patient outcomes.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.