2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00605-019-01345-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The surjectivity of the Borel mapping in the mixed setting for ultradifferentiable ramification spaces

Abstract: We consider r-ramification ultradifferentiable classes, introduced by J. Schmets and M. Valdivia in order to study the surjectivity of the Borel map, and later on also exploited by the authors in the ultraholomorphic context. We characterize quasianalyticity in such classes, extend the results of Schmets and Valdivia about the image of the Borel map in a mixed ultradifferentiable setting, and obtain a version of the Whitney extension theorem in this framework.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
45
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, condition (M, N ) γ r has appeared in the recent work by the authors [13] (mainly again for r ∈ N >0 ). There we have generalized the results from [31] to the auxiliary ultradifferentiable-like function classes, moreover in [13, Theorem 5.9], we have given a generalization of the ultradifferentiable Whitney extension results from [7] involving a ramification parameter r > 0.…”
Section: The Indices (M N) and ( !)mentioning
confidence: 84%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Finally, condition (M, N ) γ r has appeared in the recent work by the authors [13] (mainly again for r ∈ N >0 ). There we have generalized the results from [31] to the auxiliary ultradifferentiable-like function classes, moreover in [13, Theorem 5.9], we have given a generalization of the ultradifferentiable Whitney extension results from [7] involving a ramification parameter r > 0.…”
Section: The Indices (M N) and ( !)mentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The motivation of defining the mixed growth indices (especially for weight functions) was arising by proving [13,Theorem 5.9]. First we wish to mention that in [7,Commentaires 32] it was observed (without giving a proof) that there is a connection between (M, N ) γ 1 and (σ, ω) γ 1 (under suitable basic assumptions on M, N ): They have stated that (M, N ) γ 1 does imply (ω M , ω N ) γ 1 and so generalizing [15,Prop.…”
Section: Remarkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations