2022
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-05014-5_14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Surprise of Underestimation: Analyzing the Effects and Predictors of the Accuracy of Estimated Smartphone Use

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Most studies investigating screen time use rely on self-reports over shorter periods (e.g., weeks). Self-report of screen time can introduce both overestimate and underestimate actual screen time use, depending on several factors such as the type of screen time activity and ways individuals interact with their screens (e.g., habitual or occur in short bursts throughout the day) (Ohme et al 2021;Muench et al 2022). A recent study suggested that a self-report screen time questionnaire may be used to successfully classify individuals into different categories of screen time use (e.g., high vs. low), suggesting a pattern of longstanding behaviour; however, it is likely that objective measures and more frequent prospective assessments are needed to increase the precision of screen time assessment (Vizcaino et al 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most studies investigating screen time use rely on self-reports over shorter periods (e.g., weeks). Self-report of screen time can introduce both overestimate and underestimate actual screen time use, depending on several factors such as the type of screen time activity and ways individuals interact with their screens (e.g., habitual or occur in short bursts throughout the day) (Ohme et al 2021;Muench et al 2022). A recent study suggested that a self-report screen time questionnaire may be used to successfully classify individuals into different categories of screen time use (e.g., high vs. low), suggesting a pattern of longstanding behaviour; however, it is likely that objective measures and more frequent prospective assessments are needed to increase the precision of screen time assessment (Vizcaino et al 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Weiter werden für das Smartphone als das im privaten Umfeld der Kinder und Lehrpersonen populärste mobile Endgerät medienerzieherische sowie mediendidaktische Potenziale erkannt, die im Unterrichtsgeschehen bisher weitgehend ungenutzt bleiben. Ausgehend von bisherigen Studien zur Smartphone-Nutzung (Muench, Link, und Carolus 2022) Während sich die bisherigen Items auf die Smartphone-Nutzung im Allgemeinen bezogen, fragten die folgenden nach der Nutzung im Unterricht. Jeweils ein Item fragte nach Überzeugungen zur Wichtigkeit (1 «sehr wichtig» bis 5 «unwichtig») sowie zur Häufigkeit des Smartphone-Einsatzes im Unterricht (1 «sehr oft» bis 5 «nie»).…”
Section: (Medien)psychologische Perspektive Auf Digitale Medien Im Sc...unclassified