2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.lindif.2014.11.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The survey effect: Does administering surveys affect trainees' behavior?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Meichenbaum, 1985), which may lead to positive effects on the management of energy resources. Hence, the present control group could be viewed as a self-monitoring intervention (see Sitzmann & Wang, 2015).…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meichenbaum, 1985), which may lead to positive effects on the management of energy resources. Hence, the present control group could be viewed as a self-monitoring intervention (see Sitzmann & Wang, 2015).…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evaluations intentionally contained self-regulating questions, encouraging trainees to reflect on the learning process and its translation to clinical care. This was done to harness the survey effect, which posits that these types of questions can prime subjects to modify their attitudes and priorities, which in turn can enhance training effectiveness and improve learning [34–36].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, regarding performance, all groups should be treated equally and expect to do as well as the others, as outcome expectancy has been found to influence trial outcomes (Boot et al, ). In the case of non‐active control groups, it could be that any differences are a result of doing something rather than doing nothing (Sitzmann & Wang, ); thus one cannot really infer causation to treatment based on this study design. For this reason, we provided alternative designs, including active control groups, and comparison with “treatment as normal” interventions.…”
Section: Utilising Rct: Some Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Issues of research design can prompt psychological processes such as increased self‐awareness, reflection, and expectation that may influence the outcome, and without awareness, such effects can confound the results (Boot, Simons, Stothart, & Stutts, ; Sitzmann & Wang, ). There has been general criticism of the WOHP field for a lack of evaluation research and strong research designs (Brough & O'Driscoll, ; Kompier, Cooper, & Geurts, ), while also acknowledging the difficulties of adopting true experimental designs with random allocation of subjects to treatment or control groups (Cox, Karanika, Griffiths, & Houdmont, ; Grant & Wall, ; Kompier et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%