1995
DOI: 10.1016/0167-7187(95)00500-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The survival of new plants: Start-up conditions and post-entry evolution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

31
282
2
13

Year Published

1999
1999
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 426 publications
(328 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
31
282
2
13
Order By: Relevance
“…9 New firm formation has a relatively low positive impact on employment growth for the start-up year and the three years after that, possibly reflecting the small average size of start-ups, as well as high mortality rates. Studies of the evolution of new businesses, such as Boeri and Cramer (1992) for Germany, and Mata, Portugal and Guimarães (1995) for Portugal, find that employment in entry cohorts tends to stagnate or even decline from the second or the third year onwards, thus corroborating the decline in the positive effect of new business formation on employment registered in the present study.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…9 New firm formation has a relatively low positive impact on employment growth for the start-up year and the three years after that, possibly reflecting the small average size of start-ups, as well as high mortality rates. Studies of the evolution of new businesses, such as Boeri and Cramer (1992) for Germany, and Mata, Portugal and Guimarães (1995) for Portugal, find that employment in entry cohorts tends to stagnate or even decline from the second or the third year onwards, thus corroborating the decline in the positive effect of new business formation on employment registered in the present study.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Studies of new firm survival, such as the one by Mata, Portugal and Guimarães (1995), have found that initial size is a good indicator of the probability of survival, while several authors have argued that foreign direct investment is an important conduit for supply-side spillovers (see Blomström and Kokko, 1998 for a survey). In a related study, Baptista and Preto (2006) divide entry rates in the Portuguese economy into entry by large and small firms; foreign-owned and domestic-owned firms; and knowledge-based and other firms, finding that effects of new firm formation on subsequent employment change are different according to the type of entrant.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, firms that begin their activity in sectors that are undergoing a period of growth have a greater chance of growing, and therefore of surviving. Some researchers (Mata et al, 1995) argue that, in some sectors, new firms have a greater capacity to find a place in the market and remain there. In short, the rate of survival appears to be linked with the level of technology of each sector, so that firms involved in activities that are more innovation intensive are in a better position to maintain their market position over time (Cefis and Marsili, 2005).…”
Section: Technology-based Firms and Survivalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In their model, a firm knows its own characteristics and those of its competitors, along with the future distribution of industry structure, conditional on the current structure. From an empirical perspective, a recent stream of literature has focused on the post-entry performance of firms and has investigated survival, growth and early exit of newborn firms (see, for instance, Reid, 1991;Boeri and Cramer, 1992;Baldwin and Rafiquzzaman, 1995).Within this field, it is possible to analyse the relationship between ex-ante features of entry, survival and, in the case of survival, post-entry performance of newborn firms, which can be measured in terms of employment growth, profitability or market penetration.For instance, some of these studies have discovered a positive relationship between startup size and survival (see Audretsch and Mahmood, 1995;Mata, Portugal and Guimaraes, 1995; for more controversial results, see Audretsch, Santarelli and Vivarelli, 1999a;and Agarval and Audretsch, 2001). Others have found a negative relationship between start-up size and post-entry growth, thus rejecting Gibrat's Law (see Gibrat, 1931;Hall, 1987;Evans, 1987;Dunne and Hughes, 1994;Hart and Oulton, 1996;Sutton, 1997;Vivarelli, 2001 and.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%