2022
DOI: 10.3390/su14095706
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Sustainability Evaluation of Masks Based on the Integrated Rank Sum Ratio and Entropy Weight Method

Abstract: Due to the seriousness of COVID-19, masks are considered to be as a key and effective device to cut off the spread of viruses and are widely used by people, such as doctors and patients. Hundreds of millions of masks used worldwide in daily life will inevitably cause huge pollution and damage to the environment. However, existing research has not yet provided a method to simultaneously evaluate the economic, environmental, and social aspects of sustainable design of masks, which brings great barriers and chall… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To further compare the superiority-inferiority relationships of different batches of wheat, and to verify the reasonableness and accuracy of the results of wheat quality evaluation by the model in this paper, the ranking degree of each batch of wheat was measured using Equation 13 to obtain the ranking results of each batch of wheat quality by the PCA-EWM-grey system (GS) evaluation model constructed in this paper. Meanwhile, the PCA-EWM-TOPSIS evaluation model (Liu et al, 2021) and PCA-rank sum ratio (RSR) evaluation model (Lu et al, 2022) were used as comparative models to calculate and rank the superiority and inferiority relationships of each batch of wheat, respectively. Among them, the PCA-EWM-TOPSIS evaluation model used the similarity proximity C as the scoring basis, and the PCA-RSR evaluation model used the RSR value as the scoring basis.…”
Section: Analysis Of Evaluation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To further compare the superiority-inferiority relationships of different batches of wheat, and to verify the reasonableness and accuracy of the results of wheat quality evaluation by the model in this paper, the ranking degree of each batch of wheat was measured using Equation 13 to obtain the ranking results of each batch of wheat quality by the PCA-EWM-grey system (GS) evaluation model constructed in this paper. Meanwhile, the PCA-EWM-TOPSIS evaluation model (Liu et al, 2021) and PCA-rank sum ratio (RSR) evaluation model (Lu et al, 2022) were used as comparative models to calculate and rank the superiority and inferiority relationships of each batch of wheat, respectively. Among them, the PCA-EWM-TOPSIS evaluation model used the similarity proximity C as the scoring basis, and the PCA-RSR evaluation model used the RSR value as the scoring basis.…”
Section: Analysis Of Evaluation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used the entropy method and rank-sum ratio (RSR) method [57] to validate the model proposed in this research. We used the RSR method to divide the samples into four levels.…”
Section: Analysis Of Comparison With Existing Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comprehensive evaluation is when a complex system is affected by multiple factors at the same time, the system is evaluated according to multiple relevant indicators, and multiple indicators are evaluated simultaneously through some special methods and weighted according to the importance of the indicators to make the evaluation results more scientific, comprehensive and systematic; this is now widely used in practice. At present, the commonly used methods for determining comprehensive weights mainly include the scoring method [20], the comprehensive index method [21], the rank sum ratio method [22], the Topsis method [23], the analytic hierarchy process method [24] and the fuzzy analysis method [25]. The results obtained by the comprehensive evaluation methods are not exactly the same, and each method has its own scope of application.…”
Section: Selection Of Comprehensive Evaluation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%