The Sustainable Development Goals prioritize economic growth over sustainable resource use: a critical reflection on the SDGs from a socio-ecological perspective

Abstract

The sustainable development goals (SDGs) were adopted in 2015, succeeding the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs). While the MDGs focused on improving well-being in the developing world, the 17 SDGs address all countries and aim at reconciling economic and social with ecological goals. We adopt a social ecology perspective and critically reflect on the SDGs’ potential for monitoring, supporting, and bringing about a transformation towards sustainability. Starting from a literature review on the SDGs, we link empirical findings from social ecology with analyses of SDG targets and indicators. First, we find that the SDGs fail to monitor absolute trends in resource use and thus prioritize economic growth over ecological integrity. Second, we discuss the contradictions between economic growth and sustainable resource use in early and late stages of industrialization processes and show that they are responsible for important trade-offs among SDG targets. Third, we analyze the transformative potential of the SDGs with a focus on the actors and institutions addressed to bring about transformative change. We find that the SDGs rely mainly on those institutions responsible for unsustainable resource use, and partly propose measures that even reinforce current trends towards less sustainability. Despite ascertaining limited transformative potential to the SDGs from an analytical perspective, we conclude by stressing the strategic relevance of the SDGs for visions, research, and practices of statt towards transformative change towards sustainability.

Scientists’ warning on affluence

“…Hence, these approaches also differ from the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), since SDG 8 aims for continued global GDP growth of~3% p.a., likely contradicting several other SDGs, e.g. SDG 12 and 13 [81][82][83] . Further, the SDGs are not representing a theoretically coherent framework, since they are part of a deliberative process 45 , and sideline underlying power dynamics as well as interactions between injustices 83 .…”

Adjusted Net Savings of CEE and Baltic Nations in the Context of Sustainable Economic Growth: A Panel Data Analysis

“…It is generally accepted that carbon dioxide emissions impose higher costs on economic growth. In addition, poverty reduction represents a global challenge, and is one of the millennium and sustainable development goals (Eisenmenger et al 2020;World Bank 2007). In this context, economic development without environmental degradation is a constant challenge for all countries.…”

The Namibian bioeconomy: transformation to a sustainable society?

“…When conceptualising 'sustainable development' as a blueprint for discussion over desired societal developments that opens up a space to critically assess divergences within underlying objectives, strategies, practices and outcomes. For example, Eisenmenger [94] applied a social-ecological perspectives in the investigation of the effectiveness of the Sustainable Development Goals by focusing on the links between societal transformation and biophysical interactions of society with the natural environment and their iterative co-evolution: "A transformation towards sustainability has to go beyond proposals set with the SDGs; development has to merge an equal distribution of prosperity for all with ecological integrity, without depending predominantly on growth-oriented measurements of progress (p. 9).…”