2021
DOI: 10.3847/1538-3881/abdf4c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Swan: Data-driven Inference of Stellar Surface Gravities for Cool Stars from Photometric Light Curves

Abstract: Stellar light curves are well known to encode physical stellar properties. Precise, automated, and computationally inexpensive methods to derive physical parameters from light curves are needed to cope with the large influx of these data from space-based missions such as Kepler and TESS. Here we present a new methodology that we call “The Swan,” a fast, generalizable, and effective approach for deriving stellar surface gravity ( … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 95 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Each local model is constructed by defining a neighborhood around each object in some data space (e.g. see Sayeed et al 2021, for an example of this using Kepler data). This approach takes on the following steps for our N = 27, 000 stars, where the parameters that we select as predictors are Y = (T eff , log g, [Mg/H], [Fe/H]) and our goal is to predict eight abundances X = (Si, O, Ca, Ti, Ni, Al, Mn, Cr):…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each local model is constructed by defining a neighborhood around each object in some data space (e.g. see Sayeed et al 2021, for an example of this using Kepler data). This approach takes on the following steps for our N = 27, 000 stars, where the parameters that we select as predictors are Y = (T eff , log g, [Mg/H], [Fe/H]) and our goal is to predict eight abundances X = (Si, O, Ca, Ti, Ni, Al, Mn, Cr):…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the approach requires that flicker timescales be temporally resolved, which is not always the case for Kepler long-cadence data (the data available for the vast majority of Kepler targets), where the 30 min cadence fails to resolve, for instance, G-dwarf granular timescales on the order of 10 min. An additional approach that has been demonstrated is to use machine learning to extract stellar parameters such as surface gravity from the power spectra of stellar variability (Sayeed et al 2020).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, as the relation between the time-domain variability and parameters that describe this flux change over the range of the parameter space, a very flexible and therefore powerful model such as a neural network is very appealing, despite difficulties in interpretability. A simple but flexible local linear approach, however, may mitigate the challenge of interpretability (Sayeed et al 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Trained on ∼4 yr baseline data, Ness et al (2018) find the variance of their log g estimator to be <0.1 dex and the variance of their T eff estimator to be <100 K, with the information required to learn these properties being contained in ACF lags up to 35 days and 370 days, respectively, for log g and T eff . Taking a similar approach, Sayeed et al (2021) learn a local linear regression model between the power density at each frequency of smoothed Kepler power spectra and stellar properties. For upper-main-sequence and RGB stars that do not exhibit rotation, Sayeed et al (2021) learn a log g estimator with a variance <0.07 dex based on the 10 nearest neighbors in the frequency domain of the training set.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation