2005
DOI: 10.1159/000086400
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Swedish DOC System – An Attempt to Combine Documentation and Self-Evaluation

Abstract: This article addresses the issue of how documentation can become a regular and competence-raising activity in treatment settings. A documentation system in Sweden (the DOC system) is used as an illustrative example. Two propositions are put forward and discussed: it is important that (1) the documentation be in accordance with the interests of the practitioners, and (2) that the documentation be used for self-evaluation, in order to enhance the practitioners’ competence. Based on experiences using the DOC syst… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
6
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This has become a popular idea in various parts of the Swedish addiction treatment sector: The National Board of Health and Welfare (NBHW) has translated the ASI into Swedish and worked for the dissemination and implementation of standardised instruments in general (Andréasson et al, 2003;Socialstyrelsen, 2004;Nyström, Sallmén, & Öberg, 2005;Nyström, Zingmark, & Jäderland, 2009); the National Board of Institutional Care (NBIC) has translated one standardised instrument and also developed a new instrument (Söderholm, Carpelan, & Hermodsson, 2004;Jenner & Segraeus, 2005); and a Swedish dissertation has examined how standardised instruments can be used to provide local follow-up statistics (Anderberg & Dahlberg, 2009).…”
Section: The Asi and The Different Uses Of Standardised Assessment Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has become a popular idea in various parts of the Swedish addiction treatment sector: The National Board of Health and Welfare (NBHW) has translated the ASI into Swedish and worked for the dissemination and implementation of standardised instruments in general (Andréasson et al, 2003;Socialstyrelsen, 2004;Nyström, Sallmén, & Öberg, 2005;Nyström, Zingmark, & Jäderland, 2009); the National Board of Institutional Care (NBIC) has translated one standardised instrument and also developed a new instrument (Söderholm, Carpelan, & Hermodsson, 2004;Jenner & Segraeus, 2005); and a Swedish dissertation has examined how standardised instruments can be used to provide local follow-up statistics (Anderberg & Dahlberg, 2009).…”
Section: The Asi and The Different Uses Of Standardised Assessment Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All patients entering the study were assessed by the staff at the clinic (nurses, social workers) according to standard procedures at the clinic, including the interview instrument Ung-DOK [ 34 ], which is used in Sweden at juvenile detention institutions, residential treatment centers, and outpatient facilities for young patients with substance use. The assessment includes questions on sociodemographic factors, self-reported substance use patterns, and self-reported psychiatric symptoms.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The baseline assessment consisted of data derived from the standard baseline assessment used at the facility. This was a semi-structured Swedish questionnaire used in clinical assessment of adolescents and young adults with substance use problems, the adolescent version of the DOK documentation system [ 50 ]. Variables included socio-demographic data, substance use history and psychiatric problems.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%