2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.mechatronics.2011.03.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The sweep-extend mechanism: A 10-bar mechanism to perform biologically inspired burrowing motions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
6
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, a relatively low ratio of olecranon to radius length in moles, compared with that in other scratching diggers, is associated with moderate elbow extension that moves soil outward from the midline rather than rearward. These kinematics patterns contradict earlier speculations (Yalden, 1966) and may have affected the performance of burrowing robots that were built based on them (Richardson et al, 2011;Richardson, 2005, 2006). We suggest that pushing outward from the pectoral region might help moles (and mole-inspired robots) exert the highest possible forces (Hisaw, 1923).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, a relatively low ratio of olecranon to radius length in moles, compared with that in other scratching diggers, is associated with moderate elbow extension that moves soil outward from the midline rather than rearward. These kinematics patterns contradict earlier speculations (Yalden, 1966) and may have affected the performance of burrowing robots that were built based on them (Richardson et al, 2011;Richardson, 2005, 2006). We suggest that pushing outward from the pectoral region might help moles (and mole-inspired robots) exert the highest possible forces (Hisaw, 1923).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 64%
“…Researchers have long speculated about joint motion and burrowing mechanisms in fossorial tetrapods based on the morphological specializations of their forelimbs (Archer et al, 2011;Chen and Wilson, 2015;Hopkins and Davis, 2009;Kley and Kearney, 2007;Moore et al, 2013;Olson et al, 2016;Pritchard et al, 2016;Reed, 1951;Rose et al, 2013;Rupert et al, 2015;Stein, 2000;Woodman and Gaffney, 2014;Yalden, 1966). More recently, burrowing robots have been designed largely based on these speculations (Richardson et al, 2011;Richardson, 2005, 2006). Although frequently invoked, the structure-function relationship between morphological specializations and associated joint movements during mole burrowing has rarely been tested directly.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent years have seen growing interest in building robots to operate in granular media, with many potential modes of burrowing explored. As summarized by ( Wei et al, 2021 ), various burrowing robots draw inspiration from biological organisms, including moles ( Richter et al, 2002 ; Kubota et al, 2007 ; Richardson et al, 2011 ; Lee et al, 2019 ; Olaf et al, 2019 ), worms ( Omori et al, 2013 ; Tang et al, 2015 ; Fujiwara et al, 2018 ; Isaka et al, 2019 ; Liu et al, 2019 ; Ortiz et al, 2019 ; Das et al, 2020 ; Alhart, 2021 ), plant roots ( Sadeghi et al, 2014 , 2017 ), sandfish ( Maladen et al, 2011 ) and bivalves ( Germann and Carbajal, 2013 ; Winter et al, 2014 ; Tao et al, 2020 ), among others. Several works aim to draw inspiration from mole crabs to create robots with legged locomotive capabilities; Russell (2011) created a robot with external flapping fins which, due to feathering on the return stroke, can locomote in horizontal planes of motion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As early as 1997, Gromov et al were the first to propose a mole‐inspired burrowing robot for planetary soil exploration, which had a diameter of 19 mm, a length of 325 mm, a mass of 400 g, and an average power consumption of 2 W. [ 36 ] In 2002, building upon this work, Lutz Richter et al further proposed the PLUTO robot [ 37 ] by utilizing an internal hammering mechanism driven by a small motor to drill into loose to medium‐dense soil, which had a weight of 900 g, a length of 380 mm, and a diameter of 20 mm. In 2007, C. Stoker et al developed the small‐size, light‐weight, and low‐power MMUM robot, [ 38 ] which had a total mass of 2000 g, a diameter of 40 mm, a total length of 600 mm, and a maximum power of 10 W. In 2011, R Richardson et al proposed the USAR, [ 39 ] a small mobile burrowing robot equipped with a double four‐bar burrowing mechanism, a unidirectional and continuous rotational motor, a small reverse brake recoil, and high continuous burrowing efficiency. In 2014, scientists from DLR developed the heat flow probe HP3 [ 30,40,41 ] for the Insight mission, which had a total mass of 935 g, a diameter of 27 mm, a total length of 400 mm, and a maximum power of 5 W. Currently, only two such robots have been used in planetary soil exploration missions: the PLUTO carried by the Mars Express lander and the HP3 carried by the Insight lander.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%