2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10541.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The sweeping rate in diffusion-mediated reactions on dust grain surfaces

Abstract: A prominent chemical reaction in interstellar clouds is the formation of molecular hydrogen by recombination, which essentially takes place on dust grain surfaces. Analytical approaches to model such a system have hitherto neglected the spatial aspects of the problem by employing a simplistic version of the sweeping rate of reactants. We show how these aspects can be accounted for by a consistent definition of the sweeping rate, and calculate it exactly for a spherical grain. Two regimes can be identified: Sma… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
47
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
4
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is important to note that the k/k 0 values all lie in the range 0.3-1.0, showing that the simple rate method is not strongly in error for the flat surfaces considered here. This difference is mainly due to back diffusion, and the factors we found are in agreement with the predicted values of Lohmar & Krug (2006) in the high temperature end of the efficiency peak. Lohmar & Krug (2006) derived an analytical expression for the actual sweeping rate of an atom as compared with the one used in rate equations (and master equations).…”
Section: Results For Flat Surfacessupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is important to note that the k/k 0 values all lie in the range 0.3-1.0, showing that the simple rate method is not strongly in error for the flat surfaces considered here. This difference is mainly due to back diffusion, and the factors we found are in agreement with the predicted values of Lohmar & Krug (2006) in the high temperature end of the efficiency peak. Lohmar & Krug (2006) derived an analytical expression for the actual sweeping rate of an atom as compared with the one used in rate equations (and master equations).…”
Section: Results For Flat Surfacessupporting
confidence: 90%
“…This difference is mainly due to back diffusion, and the factors we found are in agreement with the predicted values of Lohmar & Krug (2006) in the high temperature end of the efficiency peak. Lohmar & Krug (2006) derived an analytical expression for the actual sweeping rate of an atom as compared with the one used in rate equations (and master equations). They found a value of 0.33 for olivine at 10 K and 0.37 for amorphous carbon at 18 K. The agreement is much less for lower surface temperatures of carboneous grains (1.0 versus 0.21 for 10 K).…”
Section: Results For Flat Surfacessupporting
confidence: 90%
“…When an atoms scans the grain surface, it can visit a site more than once, which is called backdiffusion. This effect can cause the rate equations to overestimate the molecular hydrogen formation rate up to a factor of 3 depending on the physical conditions (Lohmar & Krug 2006).…”
Section: Site Dependencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A more accurate expression for A i in the case of spherical grains appears in Ref. [20], where it is shown to be reduced by a logarithmic factor.…”
Section: The Rate Equations and The Master Equationmentioning
confidence: 99%