1997
DOI: 10.1080/15326349708807416
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The symmetric longest queue system

Abstract: We derive the performance of the exponential symmetric longest queue system from two variants: a longest queue system with Threshold Rejection of jobs and one with Threshold Addition of jobs. It is shown that these two systems provide lower and upper bounds for the performance of the longest queue system. Both variants can be analyzed efficiently. Numerical experiments demonstrate the power of the approach.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, such an approach is practically feasible only for small systems (e.g., with two locations) and for relatively low utilization levels at the production facility. Nevertheless, evidence shows that the difference in cost between the FCFS and an optimal policy diminishes as utilization increases, with this difference becoming negligible when utilization is high (see Zheng and Zipkin 1990, Zipkin 1995, van Houtum et al 1997. Assigning static priorities among the different locations could provide an alternative to the FCFS policy.…”
Section: Model Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, such an approach is practically feasible only for small systems (e.g., with two locations) and for relatively low utilization levels at the production facility. Nevertheless, evidence shows that the difference in cost between the FCFS and an optimal policy diminishes as utilization increases, with this difference becoming negligible when utilization is high (see Zheng and Zipkin 1990, Zipkin 1995, van Houtum et al 1997. Assigning static priorities among the different locations could provide an alternative to the FCFS policy.…”
Section: Model Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, because of the well-known curse of dimensionality for multidimensional MDPs, an optimal policy cannot be identified in any reasonable amount of time, except for the smallest systems (e.g., a single facility with two products) and for relatively low utilization levels. Nevertheless, there is evidence that the difference in cost between the FCFS and an optimal policy diminishes in utilization, with this difference becoming negligible when utilization is high (see Wein 1992, Zheng and Zipkin 1990, Zipkin 1995, or Van Houtum et al 1997. Static priorities among the different products can also provide an alternative to the FCFS policy.…”
Section: Model Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Zipkin (1995) examines the performance of LQ on systems with more than two products. Van Houtum et al (1997) derive lower and upper bounds for the mean waiting time for the symmetric longest queue system in order to minimize the base stock levels required to achieve a target fill rate. Wein (1992) allows for asymmetric products and derives an approximating Brownian control problem for the multi-item make-to-stock queuing problem.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%