Compared to most other birds, the taxonomy of crossbills (Loxia) is still highly unsettled. However, much progress seems to be achievable when data on vocalisations is included. In a recent paper, Summers et al. (2007) argued that strong assortative mating indicated that parrot crossbill Loxia pytyopsittacus, Scottish crossbill Loxia scotica and common crossbill Loxia curvirostra behave as good species when breeding in sympatry. Here I argue that their data, when placed in the context of other studies, also indicate that three vocally differentiated European populations within the common crossbill are species (following the biological species concept of Mayr (1963): species are groups of interbreeding natural populations that are reproductively isolated from other such groups). If this tentative conclusion remains to be upheld, it might have large repercussions for our understanding of the speciation process as well as for a number of more applied issues such as the discovery and description of biodiversity and the conversation of mobile, cryptic species.The common (red) crossbill Loxia curvirostra has long challenged taxonomic stability and customs, and seems to continue to do so. In North America various treatments have tried to mould morphological variability into geographically defined subspecific units. However, a frequent finding was that birds collected at the same locality often varied much more in morphology than did birds collected at opposite ends of the continent, or that birds collected one year differed dramatically from birds collected another year at the same locality (reviewed in Groth 1993a). The inclusion of vocal characters has proven to be a major step forward in unravelling these unusual patterns, as is often the case for morphologically similar birds with overlapping distributions (Remsen 2005). Work by Groth and Benkman has shown that at least 9 vocal types are involved. These types differ in vocalisations, morphology, ecology and genetic markers