1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0168-0102(98)00046-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The synchronization between brain areas under motor inhibition process in humans estimated by event-related EEG coherence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
26
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
4
26
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, while it is important to keep in mind that the limited spatial resolution of EEG requires a cautious approach regarding specific brain regions involvement, this finding was particularly evident in the frontal regions. Such a reduction of coherence is in accordance with previous studies that examined frontal inhibitory control by employing cortico-cortical communications during cognitive tasks (e.g., Müller & Anokhin, 2012;Schmiedt-Fehr & Basar-Eroglu, 2011;Shibata et al, 1998). Namely, in a Go/NoGo task, a higher level of EEG coherence was observed in the frontal regions when participants had to inhibit their response (i.e., NoGo condition) compared to the condition where no inhibition was required (i.e., Go condition).…”
Section: Inhibitory Control and Conflict Resolution For Cognitive-motsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, while it is important to keep in mind that the limited spatial resolution of EEG requires a cautious approach regarding specific brain regions involvement, this finding was particularly evident in the frontal regions. Such a reduction of coherence is in accordance with previous studies that examined frontal inhibitory control by employing cortico-cortical communications during cognitive tasks (e.g., Müller & Anokhin, 2012;Schmiedt-Fehr & Basar-Eroglu, 2011;Shibata et al, 1998). Namely, in a Go/NoGo task, a higher level of EEG coherence was observed in the frontal regions when participants had to inhibit their response (i.e., NoGo condition) compared to the condition where no inhibition was required (i.e., Go condition).…”
Section: Inhibitory Control and Conflict Resolution For Cognitive-motsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Furthermore, relatively few studies have employed measures of cortico-cortical communication during such challenge (e.g., Müller & Anokhin, 2012;Schmiedt-Fehr & Basar-Eroglu, 2011;Shibata et al, 1998). The present study extends the examination of executive processes to the cognitive-motor domain while considering cortico-cortical communication between the frontal region and other cortical regions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…This difference could not be confirmed for the tested cognitive abilities (concentration, attention and visuo-spatial abilities). Nevertheless, for several cognitive abilities, such as executive functions, interhemispheric communication plays an important role (Sauseng, Klimesch, Schabus, & Doppelmayr, 2005;Shibata, Shimoyama, Ito, Abla, Iwasa, Koseki, et al, 1997;Shibata, Shimoyama, Ito, Abla, Iwasa, Koseki, et al, 1998). Beside numerous intrahemispheric connections, visuospatial abilities tested by mental rotation tasks, require interhemispheric associations as well (Bhattacharya, Petsche, Feldmann, & Rescher, 2001); the neural processes associated with attention are rather ambiguous.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The frequency or spectral contents of such signals display important information and have been used to evaluate the physiological and functional state of the nervous systems. Fourier analysis has been used extensively in studying the spectra of neurophysiological signals and in recent years interests have been focused on the study of synchronised phenomena between two or more events, such as the synchronisation between brain areas [2,31] and correlation between electroencephalogram (EEG), electromyogram (EMG) and magnetoencephalogram (MEG) [9,21,22,7]. In general, the investigated signals or data are assumed to be stationary and the estimates of the individual and cross spectra are calculated to obtain the coherence estimate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%