2013
DOI: 10.4324/9780203959763
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Syntax of Negation and the Licensing of Negative Polarity Items in Hindi

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
19
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For a class of infinitival clauses in Hindi-Urdu, we find a puzzling state of affairs with negation: a negation which seems to be inside an infinitival complement has effects typical of a matrix negation, e.g., NPI licensing in the matrix. This puzzle was already observed by Mahajan (1990), Bhatt (2005) and Kumar (2006): 1 (1) Seemingly embedded negation licenses a matrix NPI: 1 ek-bhii laṛke-ne Mina-kii madad nahĩ: kar-nii caah-ii one-even boy-erg Mina-gen.f help.f neg do-inf.f want-pfv.f 'Not even a single boy wanted to help Mina. '…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For a class of infinitival clauses in Hindi-Urdu, we find a puzzling state of affairs with negation: a negation which seems to be inside an infinitival complement has effects typical of a matrix negation, e.g., NPI licensing in the matrix. This puzzle was already observed by Mahajan (1990), Bhatt (2005) and Kumar (2006): 1 (1) Seemingly embedded negation licenses a matrix NPI: 1 ek-bhii laṛke-ne Mina-kii madad nahĩ: kar-nii caah-ii one-even boy-erg Mina-gen.f help.f neg do-inf.f want-pfv.f 'Not even a single boy wanted to help Mina. '…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Where is sentential negation (abbreviated as 'NEG') in the hierarchical structure of the Hindi-Urdu clause? We will not rely on the immediately pre-verbal surface position of nahĩ:, which is not telling by itself (nahĩ: could be a specifier attached to the left of vP or a head or a specifier attached to the right of vP, see Mahajan 1990; Kumar 2006; we address the issue in the next subsection). In fact, it is in principle possible that nahĩ: is not negative, and is instead a mere correlate of a covert sentential negation (see Sect.…”
Section: Using Scope To Determine the Height Of Sentential Negationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Take, for instance negative polarity item licensing. A negative polarity item (NPI, hereafter) is an expression appearing in negative contexts and requires a licenser varying from overt negation to questions or conditionals (see Benmamoun, 1997;Kelepir, 2001;Kumar, 2006;Laka, 2013;Mahajan, 1990). These restrictions on where NPIs can or cannot appear imply that they need to be in a licensing environment:…”
Section: Conclusion and Further Theoretical Consequencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Licensing environment includes licensor and a licensee. Former accounts with a syntactic perspective tend to agree upon the necessity of a c-command relation between the NPI (as a licensee) and its licenser (Benmamoun, 1997;Kelepir, 2001;Kumar, 2006;Kural, 1997;Laka, 2013;Mahajan, 1990;Vasishth, 1999). Following Kural (1997) and Kayabaşı & Özgen (2018), NPI licensing occurs in a context where the c-command search domain is restricted to the same phase.…”
Section: Conclusion and Further Theoretical Consequencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rule that NPIs cannot be used outside of the scope of a negative element (e.g., no, nobody) has been described as a syntactic constraint (Klima, 1964;Kumar, 2006;Wang & Hsieh, 1996), because an NPI such as any requires a licensor (e.g., not) at a position that is in a higher node of a syntactic tree that directly dominates (i.e., c-commands) the NPI any. For example, the negation word not c-commands any in "the man who stood by the post did not have any money."…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%