2016
DOI: 10.3765/plsa.v1i0.3716
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Syntax of simple and compound tenses in Ndebele

Abstract: Abstract. It is a widely accepted generalization that verbal periphrasis is triggered by increased inflectional meaning and a paucity of verbal elements to support its realization. This work examines the limitations on synthetic verbal forms in Ndebele and argues that periphrasis in this language arises via a last-resort grammatical mechanism. The proposed trigger of auxiliary insertion is c-selection -a relation between inflectional categories and verbs.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In some languages, the additional component has been identified as the associative linker a- (Khumalo 1992, Demuth & Harford 1999, Cheng 2006, Zeller 2004, Henderson 2006, Taraldsen 2010; 8 in others, as the so called augment vowel, a nominal prefix (Cheng 2006, Diercks 2010, Henderson 2013. Pietraszko (2017) shows, on the basis of morphosyntactic and phonological evidence, that Ndebele relative prefixes contain all three morphemes: a regular agreement prefix, an augment vowel and the associative linker.…”
Section: ) T To V Lowering In Englishmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In some languages, the additional component has been identified as the associative linker a- (Khumalo 1992, Demuth & Harford 1999, Cheng 2006, Zeller 2004, Henderson 2006, Taraldsen 2010; 8 in others, as the so called augment vowel, a nominal prefix (Cheng 2006, Diercks 2010, Henderson 2013. Pietraszko (2017) shows, on the basis of morphosyntactic and phonological evidence, that Ndebele relative prefixes contain all three morphemes: a regular agreement prefix, an augment vowel and the associative linker.…”
Section: ) T To V Lowering In Englishmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…different words, auxiliaries and other verbal morphological pieces) -are due to the failure of the application of this operation to certain functional heads. In fact, this approach to periphrasis formation, which was at first formulated in Embick (2000) has been more recently fully developed by Bjorkman (2011), Pietraszko (2016), Fenger (2018, 2020 and Calabrese (2019). 18 In Bjorkman and Pietrasko's works, the failure of functional heads to combine with the verb is due to the action of certain nodes (or better the feature complexes of those nodes) as interveners (Rizzi 1990) in syntactic processes -such as Agree 19 -that lead to head movement.…”
Section: The Functional Structure Of Periphrastic Morphologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…23 See Calabrese (2019) for an account of this blocking. Alternative accounts of auxiliary formation can be found in Bjorkman (2011) and Pietraszko (2016Pietraszko ( , 2018.…”
Section: A Morphosyntactic Analysis Of the Infinitival Mvcmentioning
confidence: 99%