1990
DOI: 10.1139/v90-341
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The synthesis and X-ray structures of η1-, η3-, and η5-dienolate complexes of manganese carbonyl

Abstract: , and -q5-ester dienolate complexes of Mn(CO),, have been prepared and the crystal structures of the phenyl ester member have been obtained for all three bonding modes. The allyl (anti--q3) member shows some bonding distortions compared to a simple allyl ligand. The structure of the r15-1-oxapentadienyl ligand complex is substantially different from a rhenium analog in that the organic ligand is non-planar with significantly different bond distances. The r15-complex reacts rapidly with triphenylphosphine to ge… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the ordered structure of complex 5 , which has three α‐F substituents, the Mn−CF 3 distance (2.067(3) Å) is ≈0.1 Å shorter than the Mn−CH 2 CF 3 distance in compound 7 (2.162(2) Å). For comparison, other distances to the sp 3 ‐hybridized C atoms without any F substituents are 2.214(3) Å in [(CO) 5 Mn(CH 2 CH=CHCOOPh)] and 2.195(6) and 2.196(8) Å in [(CO) 5 Mn(CH 2 CH 2 ‐ o ‐C 6 H 4 −CH 2 CH 2 )Mn(CO) 5 ], whereas positional disorder in the simpler reference compound [(CO) 5 Mn(CH 3 )] prevented an accurate determination of the Mn−CH 3 distance . The distance in [(CO) 5 Mn(CH 2 Cl)], which has one α‐Cl substituent, is 2.125(10) Å .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the ordered structure of complex 5 , which has three α‐F substituents, the Mn−CF 3 distance (2.067(3) Å) is ≈0.1 Å shorter than the Mn−CH 2 CF 3 distance in compound 7 (2.162(2) Å). For comparison, other distances to the sp 3 ‐hybridized C atoms without any F substituents are 2.214(3) Å in [(CO) 5 Mn(CH 2 CH=CHCOOPh)] and 2.195(6) and 2.196(8) Å in [(CO) 5 Mn(CH 2 CH 2 ‐ o ‐C 6 H 4 −CH 2 CH 2 )Mn(CO) 5 ], whereas positional disorder in the simpler reference compound [(CO) 5 Mn(CH 3 )] prevented an accurate determination of the Mn−CH 3 distance . The distance in [(CO) 5 Mn(CH 2 Cl)], which has one α‐Cl substituent, is 2.125(10) Å .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 1 H NMR spectrum of 3 displayed all expected signals with the 2 typical broad multiplets of the ferrocenyl's cyclopentadienyl entities at 4.31 and 4.19 ppm. The 13 C NMR spectrum of 3 at 263 K displayed also all the expected signals. The chemical shifts of the three carbonyl ligands coordi- The ORTEP-type diagram of 3 shown in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Noteworthy, such one-pot aldol condensation was already observed for acetylferrocene by Bruce [10] using MeMn(CO) 5 as well as by Woodgate [11] for [h 6 -(phenyl)-ethanone]Cr(CO) 3 6 using (h 1 -benzyl)Mn(CO) 5 . Moreover, Wu [12] and Sorensen [13] reported separately the preparation of the 1,3-diferrocenyl-buten-1-one ligand 7 through aldol condensation under conventional conditions. The case reported by Bruce [10] resembles the one dealt with herein: in the formation of 3 the putative "aldol" condensation of 1 should result formally only in the loss of water and the formation of toluene, the presence of which was practically not sought (Scheme 1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations