The Syrian chemical weapons disarmament process in context: narratives of coercion, consent, and everything in between

Makdisi, Karim; Hindawi, Coralie Pison

doi:10.1080/01436597.2017.1322462

Cited by 7 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 11 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Deft diplomacy by Moscow in the form of agreeing to monitor the destruction of Assad's chemical weapons cache, however, quickly defused the crisis and allowed the US to avoid any military action in Syria. 42 It also demonstrated to the Russians and others just how deeply reticent the US was to get involved in Syria. 43 In October 2014, as Turkey attempted to address the volatile situation AA published a map showing Ankara's proposed safe zones.…”

Section: -2014: Internationalism Refugees and The Kurdish Questionmentioning

confidence: 98%

Shifting Policies in Conflict Arenas: A Cosine Similarity and Text Mining Analysis of Turkey’s Syria Policy, 2012-2016

Cannon

Nakayama

Sasaki³

et al. 2019

JSS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: -2014: Internationalism Refugees and The Kurdish Questionmentioning

confidence: 98%

Shifting Policies in Conflict Arenas: A Cosine Similarity and Text Mining Analysis of Turkey’s Syria Policy, 2012-2016

Cannon

Nakayama

Sasaki³

et al. 2019

JSS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Again, countries like Iraq, Libya, and Syria were compelled to dismantle their nuclear weapons programs through external power intervention. However, despite being a member of the NPT, Iran has been pursuing an alleged nuclear weapons program (Makdisi and Hindawi 2017). During this time, nations such as Argentina, Brazil, South Korea, and Taiwan voluntarily abandoned their efforts to develop nuclear weapons and decided to become nuclear-free states.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Iran’s Nuclear Policy: Nature, Ambition, and Strategy

Eneyo

Talib

Attah

et al. 2022

JLIA

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons represent the biggest danger to humanity. During the Cold War, the US and USSR provided "umbrella protection" to convince allies not to acquire nuclear weapons. Most "newly" independent nations never had such security during the Cold War since they were not part of a power bloc. During the Iran-Iraq conflict (1980)(1981)(1982)(1983)(1984)(1985)(1986)(1987)(1988), the Islamic Republic of Iran was attacked with chemical weapons. Since Mujahedin-e-Khalq (MEK), an Iranian exile organization, exposed Iran's hidden nuclear program in 2002, the topic has gained worldwide attention. Iran's nuclear agenda has produced a worldwide catastrophe despite its NPT membership. Iran says its nuclear program is peaceful and respects Islamic values. Most US politicians and academics consider Iran a rough nation with political and strategic concerns, including regional hegemony, human rights, terrorism, WMD proliferation, and military operations beyond the border. This study examines Iran's nuclear policies to demonstrate its essence, goal, and strategy.

show abstract

A conditional norm: chemical warfare from colonialism to contemporary civil wars

Tezcür

Horschig²

2020

Third World Quarterly

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Syrian chemical weapons disarmament process in context: narratives of coercion, consent, and everything in between

Cited by 7 publications

References 11 publications

Shifting Policies in Conflict Arenas: A Cosine Similarity and Text Mining Analysis of Turkey’s Syria Policy, 2012-2016

Shifting Policies in Conflict Arenas: A Cosine Similarity and Text Mining Analysis of Turkey’s Syria Policy, 2012-2016

Iran’s Nuclear Policy: Nature, Ambition, and Strategy

A conditional norm: chemical warfare from colonialism to contemporary civil wars

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About