1969
DOI: 10.1007/bf00208050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The system Ag-Sb-S from 600�C to 200�C

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
38
0
1

Year Published

1973
1973
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
4
38
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A charge was run at 500 ~ with an equivalent starting composition and 98 ~o of phase cm produced. X-ray diffraction analysis reveals it to have an identical structure to the quenchable high temperature (> 380 ~ cubic form of miargyrite, fl-AgSbS2 (Keighin and Honea, 1969). Cm may represent a member of a solid-solution series involving Cd substitution according to 2Cd § ~ Ag++Sb 3+ into miargyrite, AgSbS2.…”
Section: Experimental Methods and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A charge was run at 500 ~ with an equivalent starting composition and 98 ~o of phase cm produced. X-ray diffraction analysis reveals it to have an identical structure to the quenchable high temperature (> 380 ~ cubic form of miargyrite, fl-AgSbS2 (Keighin and Honea, 1969). Cm may represent a member of a solid-solution series involving Cd substitution according to 2Cd § ~ Ag++Sb 3+ into miargyrite, AgSbS2.…”
Section: Experimental Methods and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Keighin & Honea (1969) determined 197°C as the maximum temperature of stephanite formation. The mineral breaks down to pyrargyrite and argentite during heating above this temperature.…”
Section: Epithermal Character Of Ag-mineralizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an alternative, it could be an Ag-rich sulfosalt that has not been previously described, or an intergrowth of pyrargyrite, acanthite or argentite, and dyscrasite that is so fine that individual phases are not resolvable with the electron microprobe. As far as its relationship to the formation of a polymetallic melt is concerned, the identity of the Ag, Sb, S phase is not critical because its bulk composition would have been molten at 1 bar and 500°C regardless of what phases are present (Keighin & Honea 1969). At one bar, the bulk composition of the pyrargyrite melts congruently at 485°C and the eutectic between pyrargyrite and argentite lies at 465°C (Fig.…”
Section: Sulfide Sulfosalt and Alloy Assemblagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At one bar, the bulk composition of the pyrargyrite melts congruently at 485°C and the eutectic between pyrargyrite and argentite lies at 465°C (Fig. 10) (Keighin & Honea, 1969). Because pyrargyrite and argentite melt at a binary euctectic, rather than melting incongruently to dyscrasite (or allargentum, Ag 6 Sb), the pyrargyrite-argentite join is a thermal barrier.…”
Section: Sulfide Sulfosalt and Alloy Assemblagesmentioning
confidence: 99%