1998
DOI: 10.2307/2902938
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The System of Early Modern Painting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In his 1998 essay, Harry Berger Jr. [1] describes what he and others saw as a monolithic view in academic discourse on the early modern period. Martin Jay termed…”
Section: Early Modern Painting: Monolithic Mechanistic Viewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In his 1998 essay, Harry Berger Jr. [1] describes what he and others saw as a monolithic view in academic discourse on the early modern period. Martin Jay termed…”
Section: Early Modern Painting: Monolithic Mechanistic Viewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Directing the viewer's gaze to selected regions in a portrait is one of the tools a modern artist has for emphasizing certain character traits of the sitter and for giving viewers a glimpse into the collaboration between sitter and painter in the development of a portrait [7,8,9]. In addition to being consistent with the modern understanding of mind-eye dynamics, artists' selective application of detail is also consistent with the specialized neural pathways of human vision: coarse brushwork corresponds to low spatial frequency information that is transmitted very rapidly to many regions of the visual system to help orient the eyes to points of possible interest, whereas fine brushwork corresponds to higher spatial frequency channels that transmit more slowly to the centers involved in detailed and prolonged inspection [10,11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moving in the other direction, the present data help build the art historical case that during the Renaissance period Rembrandt was one of the first artists to begin exploring the consequences of varying relative textural detail in his artwork (see the full development of this art historical argument in DiPaola et al 2010). This argument for precedence had been made previously by art historians, including Berger (1998Berger ( , 2000 and Martin (1988), in the context of a much wider discussion of how the Renaissance application of science to art went well beyond the contribution of mathematics, perspective, and geometry in the construction of a painted image. Specifically, these authors propose that the emerging understanding of science during the Renaissance included an understanding, implicit or explicit, of the perceptualmotor dynamics that occur when a human eye with limited spatial resolution is confronted with a large scene or image.…”
Section: Implications For Visual Art and Sciencementioning
confidence: 84%