2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jada.2011.01.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Systematic Review Methodology Used to Support the 2010 Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The systematic review methodology used to support the 2010 guidelines is described in full elsewhere (9). In brief, for each systematic review question, committee members created a literature search protocol defining inclusion and exclusion criteria, to generate approved lists of included and excluded articles.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The systematic review methodology used to support the 2010 guidelines is described in full elsewhere (9). In brief, for each systematic review question, committee members created a literature search protocol defining inclusion and exclusion criteria, to generate approved lists of included and excluded articles.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the United States, the Dietary Guidelines to Americans (DGA) are updated every 5 years by the US Department of Agriculture and the US Department of Health and Human Services. The 2005 DGA [14] were updated and 2010 DGA [15] were supported and created by Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee [16]. In most European countries, the FoodBased Dietary Guidelines (FBDG) are in force [17].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The details of the structured process and their implementation vary among SR approaches (1,5,16,20,25,52,54,62) but always include each of the following steps: (a) an explicit statement of the objectives including the formulation of a defined, focused, and answerable question or set of questions, along with a protocol for the SR; (b) the explicit prespecification of eligibility inclusion criteria; (c) an explicit and reproducible search methodology, including transparent and comprehensive literature search strategy or strategies, screening selection, and extraction; (d ) a structured critical assessment and statement of the findings and their validity; and (e) a structured and comprehensive presentation of the included studies and their findings, which may include quantitative processes such as meta-analysis of the data across the studies. Some, but not necessarily all, SRs include a sixth step in which the results of the SR are synthesized and interpreted with a conclusion statement (6) using various graphic, evidence-mapping, and other interpretive methods.…”
Section: The Nature Of Systematic Review Definitionmentioning
confidence: 99%