2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.crma.2008.06.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Szegő and Avram–Parter theorems for general test functions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In summary, from (51) we have T * n,α T n,α = T µα ( |f | (2) ) + R n,m,α + N n,m,α , with {T µα ( |f | (2) )} n ∼ σ ( |f | (2) , Q). We recall that, owing to (55), the relation |f…”
Section: Singular Value Distribution For the Sequence {[T N Z Nα |0]} Nmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In summary, from (51) we have T * n,α T n,α = T µα ( |f | (2) ) + R n,m,α + N n,m,α , with {T µα ( |f | (2) )} n ∼ σ ( |f | (2) , Q). We recall that, owing to (55), the relation |f…”
Section: Singular Value Distribution For the Sequence {[T N Z Nα |0]} Nmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…-if k is not a multiple of α, then e In summary, from (51) we have (2) , Q). We recall that, owing to (55), the relation |f (2) , Q).…”
Section: Some Remarks Are In Ordermentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The case where the compact set E is a union of m disjoint closed intervals (possibly, degenerate) has been treated in [12] (Theorem 3.6). The general case follows since, for the notion of strong clustering we have to consider the ǫ fattening of E, or D(E, ǫ) defined as in relation (6). It is clear that for every compact set E, the closure of D(E, ǫ) is a finite union of closed intervals and so the general case is reduced to that handled in [12].…”
Section: Eigenvalue Distribution and Clusteringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(The book [8] gives a synopsis of all these results in Chapters 5 and 6 and other interesting facts in Chapter 3 concerning the relation between the pseudospectrum of {T n (f )} ∞ n=1 and that of T (f )). The relation (1) was established for a more general class of test functions F in [35,26,6] and the case of functions f of several variables (the multilevel case) and matrix-valued functions was studied in [35] and in [23] in the context of preconditioning (other related results were established by Linnik, Widom, Doktorski, see Section 6.9 in [8]).…”
Section: Introduction and Basic Notationsmentioning
confidence: 99%