2022
DOI: 10.1007/jhep02(2022)206
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The tadpole conjecture at large complex-structure

Abstract: The tadpole conjecture by Bena, Blåbäck, Graña and Lüst effectively states that for string-theory compactifications with a large number of complex-structure moduli, not all of these moduli can be stabilized by fluxes. In this note we study this conjecture in the large complex-structure regime using statistical data obtained by Demirtas, Long, McAllister and Stillman for the Kreuzer-Skarke list. We estimate a lower bound on the flux number in type IIB Calabi-Yau orientifold compactifications at large complex-st… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
47
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
5
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our central result (3.12) provides a quantitative lower bound on the flux-induced D3 tadpole. The tadpole conjecture [21,[42][43][44][45] on the other hand states that, for a large number h 2,1 of complex structure (CS) moduli, the tadpole of the 3-form flux required to stabilize all of them in a non-singular regime grows faster than the negative tadpole of the corresponding orientifold geometry. If the conjecture were true, it would be logical to focus on LVS models with a large tadpole and a small number of moduli, escaping the allegedly dangerous asymptotic regime.…”
Section: Interplay With the Tadpole Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our central result (3.12) provides a quantitative lower bound on the flux-induced D3 tadpole. The tadpole conjecture [21,[42][43][44][45] on the other hand states that, for a large number h 2,1 of complex structure (CS) moduli, the tadpole of the 3-form flux required to stabilize all of them in a non-singular regime grows faster than the negative tadpole of the corresponding orientifold geometry. If the conjecture were true, it would be logical to focus on LVS models with a large tadpole and a small number of moduli, escaping the allegedly dangerous asymptotic regime.…”
Section: Interplay With the Tadpole Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4, we discuss how one may try to strengthen the LVS proposal in the future in spite of the presented constraint. We also discuss further challenges and comment on the interplay of our constraint with the tadpole conjecture [21,[42][43][44][45].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the context of Type IIB Calabi-Yau flux compactifications, the conjecture claims that the flux contribution to the D3-brane tadpole condition scales as N flux = F 3 ∧ H 3 > 2α(h 2,1 + 1) for large h 2,1 (5.21) where h 2,1 is the number of complex structure moduli and α is conjectured to be 1/3. Reference [36] checked this conjecture in the large complex structure regime by using Kahler moduli data of the mirror dual Calabi-Yau threefold in the Kreuzer-Skarke database [37] presented in [31]. The large complex structure regime maps to the stretched Kahler cone of the mirror defined by setting all curve volumes ≥ 1 to keep computational control.…”
Section: Relation To the Tadpole Conjecturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is exactly the same optimization problem that we have attacked in this paper! In [36] this minimal volume was estimated, although not computed explicitly, using the results of [31] to grow as N flux min(vol(CY 3 )) ∼ h 6.6 2,1 . We cannot apply directly our results to this setup, since we have only computed explicitly the volume of the base of the elliptically fibered threefolds, and not of the total Calabi-Yau.…”
Section: Relation To the Tadpole Conjecturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given that very little is known about the corrections which induce the scalar potential pieces to perform moduli stabilization, it is an important question to ask if the de-Sitter vacua which pass the tests in the first two steps are genuine or not. For example, the questions regarding scale separation and field excursions in moduli space [66][67][68][69][70][71][72][73][74][75][76][77][78][79][80][81][82] without breaking effective field theory (EFT) assumptions, tadpole conjecture [83][84][85] and ways to avoid it [86] may be considered in this class. In fact, it happens very often that the scalar potential corrections are known only in pieces and are sometimes discovered/challenged with new updates, and in this regard, a perfect check about viability may be considered as the toughest task for string phenomenologists !…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%