2020
DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4759.3.11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The tadpoles of Murree Hills Frog Nanorana vicina (Anura: Dicroglossidae)

Abstract: The genus Nanorana, also called Yunnan Slow Frogs (Frank & Ramus 1995), belongs to the family Dicroglossidae. Murree Hills Frog N. vicina, is an endemic species of Southeast Asian uplands in Pakistan and India and was first reported by Stoliczka (1872) from Murree, Punjab Province, Pakistan. Later Rais et al. (2014) recaptured it from its type locality and described morphology of one juvenile female and one adult male. The species is listed as Least Concern in IUCN Red List of Threatened Species while the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 525 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our tadpoles differ significantly from those of Nanorana vicina (Stoliczka, 1872), which is endemic to uplands in Pakistan and India. Compared to A. hazarensis, the number of tooth rows on the upper labia of the N. vicina tadpoles is lower (5 vs. 7 or 8; no difference on lower labia), and the submarginal papillae are not cumulated laterally (Gill et al 2020). Further, except for N. taihangnica, the keratodont row formula for the upper labia differs between A.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Our tadpoles differ significantly from those of Nanorana vicina (Stoliczka, 1872), which is endemic to uplands in Pakistan and India. Compared to A. hazarensis, the number of tooth rows on the upper labia of the N. vicina tadpoles is lower (5 vs. 7 or 8; no difference on lower labia), and the submarginal papillae are not cumulated laterally (Gill et al 2020). Further, except for N. taihangnica, the keratodont row formula for the upper labia differs between A.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Our tadpoles differ significantly from those of Nanorana vicina (Stoliczka, 1872), which is endemic to uplands in northern Pakistan and India. Compared to A. hazarensis, the number of tooth rows on the upper labia of the N. vicina tadpoles is fewer (5 vs. 7 or 8; no difference on lower labia), and the submarginal papillae are not cumulated laterally (Gill et al 2020). Furthermore, except for N. taihangnica, the keratodont row formula for the upper labia differs between A.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Our tadpole differs significantly from those of Nanorana hazarensis , and N. vicina (Stoliczka 1872), which are endemic to the Kashmir Himalaya ( N. hazarensis ), and uplands in Pakistan and India ( N. vicina ). Compared with N. hazarensis , the number of tooth rows on the upper labia of Chrysopaa is smaller (4–5 vs. 7–8; no difference on lower labia; Hofmann et al 2021b); in N. vicina the first two anterior tooth rows are continuous (Gill et al 2020), while in Chrysopaa it is only A 1 . In both, N. hazarensis and N. vicina , the oral apparatus is much more prominent than in Chrysopaa .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%