The tail flick warning signals and the molecular phylogeny and evolution of gobiid fishes associated with burrowing alpheid shrimps

Karplus, Ilan

doi:10.1007/s13199-022-00858-9

Cited by 3 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 17 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…33 Furthermore, by doing that, shrimps can extend their shelters due to living at least in pairs, 37 and they often move between adjacent burrows as well as a part of their reproductive behavior. 29 Weiler 38 also demonstrated that paired openings to the burrows of shrimps were found. This means that at least two shrimps will be associated with one or two goby fishes, and they live in this burrow system together against predators.…”

Section: 22mentioning

confidence: 97%

“…28 Regarding predators on coral reefs in abundance, it is strongly believed that the primary function of the featured mutualistic marine association is a reason to explain directly that the mortality is reduced significantly for both goby and shrimp. 29,30 From the aspect of the goby fish, the shrimp provides shelter from predators, thereby reducing the rates of death for goby fish. Similarly, rates of death for the shrimp are alleviated since goby fishes warn shrimp via tactile communication when active outside the shelter is the presence or not of predators.…”

Section: Biogeography Of Shrimps and Goby Fishesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Regarding predators on coral reefs in abundance, it is strongly believed that the primary function of the featured mutualistic marine association is a reason to explain directly that the mortality is reduced significantly for both goby and shrimp 29,30 . From the aspect of the goby fish, the shrimp provides shelter from predators, thereby reducing the rates of death for goby fish.…”

Section: A Nature‐inspired Algorithmmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

A nonlinear optimization method for calibration of large‐scale deep cement mixing in very soft clay deep excavation

To,

Minh,

Huynh

et al. 2024

Num Anal Meth Geomechanics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This work proposes a novel technique to conduct back‐analysis of lateral displacement of deep cement mixing (DCM) columns in deep excavation construction. For the first time, we propose a process to investigate both soil and underground structure end‐to‐end automatically. The novel technique is a complex combination of three crucial factors: (1) a nature‐inspired optimization algorithm (O), (2) a three‐dimensional PLAXIS Geotechnical Engineering software (P) and (3) a modern Python language programming (P), hereinafter called the a nature‐inspired optimization algorithm (O), a three‐dimensional PLAXIS Geotechnical Engineering software (P) and a modern Python language programming (P) (OPP) technique. The novel meta‐heuristic algorithm simulated the co‐evolved partnership behavior of shrimps and goby fishes, termed Shrimp and Goby Association (SGA), which plays an important role in complex analyses. A series of exams to determine the SGA's performance is conducted on 38 benchmark test functions (IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation 2017 and 2019) and three real‐world engineering design problems to showcase its applicability. The metaheuristic and PLAXIS 3D analysis work well together, which makes the back‐analysis technique powerfully to determinate stiffness parameters instead of the traditional approaches. Based on the optimized parameters, the lateral deflection of DCM and soil are well predicted for excavation. This study proposes a technique to estimate efficiently the stiffness parameter for very soft soil. As a consequence of the optimization process, an equation to determine the stiffness parameter of DCM columns from laboratory test is also proposed. Based on the obtained results, this research provides a comprehensive methodology for predicting risk, enhancing safety, saving time and money, and effectively designing and constructing underground structures.

show abstract

Section: 22mentioning

confidence: 97%

Section: Biogeography Of Shrimps and Goby Fishesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: A Nature‐inspired Algorithmmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

A nonlinear optimization method for calibration of large‐scale deep cement mixing in very soft clay deep excavation

To,

Minh,

Huynh

et al. 2024

Num Anal Meth Geomechanics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…We have considered the KNFm assemblage in terms of the well-documented mutualistic relationship between alpheid and gobiid partners in modern shallow-marine realms across the globe (Karplus, 1987;Karplus and Thompson, 2011;Jaafar and Hou, 2012;Werding et al, 2016). Numerous studies on extant alpheid shrimps and gobiid fishes have emphasized the symbiotic relationship between these groups, both in the natural environment as well as in captivity, i.e., in an aquarium (Luther, 1958).…”

Section: Symbiosismentioning

confidence: 99%

Oldest Asian Record of Snapping Shrimps (Malacostraca: Alpheidae) from the Kutch Basin, Western India and Associated Biota: Biostratigraphic, Paleoenvironmental and Paleoecological Significance

Kapur¹,

Kumar²,

PANDYA³

et al. 2022

Acta Geologica Sinica (Eng)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The oldest Asian record of alpheid shrimps, assigned to genus Alpheus, based on snapping claw fingertips from the Miocene Khari Nadi Formation in the Kutch Basin, western India reported herein, extends the fossil record of the family Alpheidae from Asia by ∼22 million years. An early Miocene (Aquitanian) age is estimated based on the associated assemblage of calcareous nannofossils, Sphenolithus disbelemnos, Cyclicargolithus floridanus, and Reticulofenestra haqii. The co‐occurring microbiota includes bony fish otolith remains, identified as “genus Gobiidarum”, isolated teeth of Dasyatis rays, Sphyrna sharks, and teleosts, ctenoid and placoid scales, ostracods, belonging to the genera Paractinocythereis, Alocopocythere, Ruggieria, Aglaiocypris, Bairdoppilata, and echinoid spines. Taken together, the microfossil assemblage and data from chemical analyses using Energy Dispersive Spectroscopy, X‐Ray Diffraction and Wavelength Dispersive X‐Ray Fluorescence of host and associated lithologies suggests prevalence of a shallow (neritic) to coastal marine (intertidal) depositional paleoenvironment. The present investigation also provides the oldest fossil evidence on the co‐occurrence of Alpheus and gobiids (based on otoliths) that strongly advocates that the mutualistic association between these animal groups had developed by the Aquitanian.

show abstract

“…Certain burrow-dwelling marine fish live in an intriguing mutualism with shrimp. For example, in coral reefs around the world, over 120 different species of gobies and 20 alpheid shrimp are known to engage in mutualistic interactions [20]. The shrimp constructs a burrow in the sandy substrate on the seabed, which acts as a refuge against would-be predators and thus benefits the goby, while the visual acuity and vigilance of the goby benefit the shrimp by warning it of impending threats [21][22][23] (see also electronic supplementary material, Appendix 1).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Size dependent antipredator responses in a fish–shrimp mutualism

Polverino,

Lehtonen,

Geschke

et al. 2024

Biol. Lett.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

For prey, taking refuge from predators has obvious fitness benefits but may also be costly by impinging on time and effort available for feeding or attracting mates. The antipredator responses of refuge-seeking animals are therefore predicted to vary strategically depending on how threatening they perceive the risk. To test this, we studied the impacts of a simulated predatory threat on the antipredator responses of wild sandy prawn-gobies ( Ctenogobiops feroculus ) that co-inhabit burrows with Alpheus shrimp (family Alpheidae) in a mutualistic relationship. We exposed goby–shrimp pairs, repeatedly on three separate occasions, to an approaching threat and measured the antipredator behaviours of both partners. We found that re-emerging from the burrow took longer in large compared to small fish. Moreover, quicker re-emergence by small—but not medium or large-sized gobies—was associated with an earlier flight from the approaching threat (i.e. when the threat was still further away). Finally, the goby and shrimp sharing a burrow were matched in body size and their risk-taking behaviour was highly dependent on one another. The findings contribute to our understanding of how an individual's phenotype and perception of danger relates to its risk-taking strategy, and how mutualistic partners can have similar risk sensitivities.

show abstract

The tail flick warning signals and the molecular phylogeny and evolution of gobiid fishes associated with burrowing alpheid shrimps

Cited by 3 publications

References 17 publications

A nonlinear optimization method for calibration of large‐scale deep cement mixing in very soft clay deep excavation

A nonlinear optimization method for calibration of large‐scale deep cement mixing in very soft clay deep excavation

Oldest Asian Record of Snapping Shrimps (Malacostraca: Alpheidae) from the Kutch Basin, Western India and Associated Biota: Biostratigraphic, Paleoenvironmental and Paleoecological Significance

Size dependent antipredator responses in a fish–shrimp mutualism

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About