2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10687-021-00417-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The tail process and tail measure of continuous time regularly varying stochastic processes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
53
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
2
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Proof of Corollary 2.1. First, let us notice that H δ Z = 0 for some δ ≥ 0 if and only if S δ (Z) = ∞ almost surely, which is a direct implication of [14], [22], and [34,35,36] ; this has already been discussed in [17], [9], and [37] for the case d = 1, and [20] for the d-dimensional discrete setup. Note in passing that in [14]…”
Section: Proofsmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Proof of Corollary 2.1. First, let us notice that H δ Z = 0 for some δ ≥ 0 if and only if S δ (Z) = ∞ almost surely, which is a direct implication of [14], [22], and [34,35,36] ; this has already been discussed in [17], [9], and [37] for the case d = 1, and [20] for the d-dimensional discrete setup. Note in passing that in [14]…”
Section: Proofsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…The two expressions in (1.2) paved the way for simulations of Pickands constants and inspired new formulas for extremal indices of stationary time series; see e.g. [12], [19], [11], [8], [30], [20], and [37].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…which together with (4.3) yields lim δ↓0 H δ Z = H 0 Z . Proof of Corollary 1 First, let us notice that H δ Z = 0 for some δ ≥ 0 if and only if S δ (Z) = ∞ almost surely, which is a direct implication of [15,21] and [33][34][35]; this has been already discussed in [10,17,36] for the case d = 1 and [20] for the d-dimensional discrete setup. Note in passing that in [15] Z is such that P{sup t∈R d Z(t) > 0} = 1.…”
Section: Proofsmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…2)], see also [36] for other equivalent formulations. We note in passing that (2.1) is initially derived for Z…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation