2001
DOI: 10.1080/15332276.2001.11672972
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Talent Development of American Physics Olympians

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In most of these contests, students compete in multiple rounds against each other, first through remote problem solving and eventually through in-person live contests [8]. Students participating in these competitions report positive effects on their interest and career decisions [11]. Furthermore, research on former participants suggests that the vast majority of the competitors in the higher rounds pursue a math or sciencerelated career and exhibit performance above average [12].…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In most of these contests, students compete in multiple rounds against each other, first through remote problem solving and eventually through in-person live contests [8]. Students participating in these competitions report positive effects on their interest and career decisions [11]. Furthermore, research on former participants suggests that the vast majority of the competitors in the higher rounds pursue a math or sciencerelated career and exhibit performance above average [12].…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter research finding has been verified by Chan (1996), who reported that adolescent gifted students were more likely to attribute failure to lack of effort than to attribute it to low ability. The American and Taiwanese Olympians have also attributed success and failure more to effort than to ability (Feng, Campbell, & Verna, 2001;Wu & Chen, 2001). Heller and Lengfelder (2000) investigated 100 German Olympian finalists and 135 Prefinalists in mathematics, physics, and chemistry.…”
Section: Mathematical Giftedness and Attribution Stylesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SaaS questionnaire included 18 items measuring the students' attributions based on self-attribution theory (Weiner, 1974). Although Weiner's original conceptualization contained four attributions (ability, effort, difficulty, and luck), the statistical analysis based on numerous empirical samples produced only two distinct scales: Effort and Ability (Campbell, 1996a(Campbell, , 1996bFeng et al, 2001;Heller & Lengfelder, 2000;Tirri, 2001). In each of these studies, a consistent factor structure was found for the Ability and Effort scales.…”
Section: Measurement Instrumentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In studies of academic Olympians using Weiner's theory, the Finnish Olympians tend to attribute success and failure both to ability and to effort, and identify effort as being slightly more important for talent development than ability (Tirri, 2001). Similarly, the Taiwanese of China and the American Olympic participants attribute achievement more to effort than to ability (Feng, Campbell, & Verna, 2001;Wu & Chen, 2001), while the German participants attribute their achievements more to ability (Heller & Lengfelder, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%